PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLV vs. ABBV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLV vs. ABBV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) and AbbVie Inc. (ABBV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLV achieves a -0.98% return, which is significantly lower than ABBV's -0.77% return. Over the past 10 years, XLV has underperformed ABBV with an annualized return of 9.65%, while ABBV has yielded a comparatively higher 18.63% annualized return.


XLV

1D
-0.24%
1M
6.38%
YTD
-0.98%
6M
1.65%
1Y
15.62%
3Y*
7.16%
5Y*
6.05%
10Y*
9.65%

ABBV

1D
-1.83%
1M
10.68%
YTD
-0.77%
6M
1.62%
1Y
21.34%
3Y*
21.59%
5Y*
18.74%
10Y*
18.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLV vs. ABBV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
-0.98%14.50%2.47%2.07%-2.08%26.04%13.30%20.45%6.28%21.77%
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
-0.77%33.08%18.86%-0.23%24.01%32.43%27.72%1.47%-0.96%60.07%

Correlation

The correlation between XLV and ABBV is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.63

The correlation between XLV and ABBV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLV vs. ABBV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLV
XLV Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
XLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLV Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
XLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

ABBV
ABBV Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ABBV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABBV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABBV Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
ABBV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABBV Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLV vs. ABBV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) and AbbVie Inc. (ABBV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLVABBVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.17

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.50

1.24

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.60

2.77

+0.83

XLV vs. ABBV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is comparable to the ABBV Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLV and ABBV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLVABBVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

0.88

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.82

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.73

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.74

-0.28

Drawdowns

XLV vs. ABBV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLV drawdown since its inception was -39.17%, smaller than the maximum ABBV drawdown of -45.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLV and ABBV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLVABBVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.17%

-45.09%

+5.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.47%

-17.32%

+6.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.11%

-20.74%

+3.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.11%

-21.92%

+4.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.40%

-45.09%

+16.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.32%

-6.55%

+2.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.12%

-10.72%

+3.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.35%

7.72%

-3.37%

Volatility

XLV vs. ABBV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) is 5.02%, while AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) has a volatility of 6.39%. This indicates that XLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABBV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLVABBVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.02%

6.39%

-1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.66%

17.89%

-7.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.99%

24.33%

-9.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.76%

22.91%

-8.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.58%

25.74%

-9.16%

Dividends

XLV vs. ABBV - Dividend Comparison

XLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, less than ABBV's 3.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
3.02%2.87%3.49%3.82%3.49%3.84%4.41%4.83%3.89%2.65%3.64%3.41%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.64%1.60%1.67%1.59%1.47%1.33%1.49%2.17%1.57%1.47%1.60%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLV and ABBV have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ABBV has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to XLV (5.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLV dropped -39.17% vs ABBV's -45.09%.

XLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLV and ABBV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer