PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLU vs. NFG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLU vs. NFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and National Fuel Gas Company (NFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLU achieves a 2.66% return, which is significantly higher than NFG's -4.09% return. Over the past 10 years, XLU has outperformed NFG with an annualized return of 8.99%, while NFG has yielded a comparatively lower 6.57% annualized return.


XLU

1D
-1.87%
1M
-2.68%
YTD
2.66%
6M
3.35%
1Y
10.26%
3Y*
12.85%
5Y*
9.10%
10Y*
8.99%

NFG

1D
-1.38%
1M
-3.99%
YTD
-4.09%
6M
-5.13%
1Y
-5.21%
3Y*
16.94%
5Y*
10.37%
10Y*
6.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLU vs. NFG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.66%16.03%23.31%-7.18%1.44%17.70%0.51%25.93%3.94%12.05%
NFG
National Fuel Gas Company
-4.09%35.31%25.38%-17.71%1.87%60.66%-7.58%-5.94%-3.74%-0.20%

Correlation

The correlation between XLU and NFG is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998

0.50

The correlation between XLU and NFG shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.52 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLU vs. NFG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLU
XLU Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
XLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLU Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
XLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLU Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

NFG
NFG Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
NFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFG Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
NFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFG Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLU vs. NFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and National Fuel Gas Company (NFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLUNFGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

0.97

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

-0.26

+1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.47

-0.56

+3.03

XLU vs. NFG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLU Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is higher than the NFG Sharpe Ratio of -0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLU and NFG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLUNFGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

-0.26

+0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.47

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.27

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.39

+0.01

Drawdowns

XLU vs. NFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLU drawdown since its inception was -51.98%, smaller than the maximum NFG drawdown of -55.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLU and NFG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLUNFGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.98%

-55.49%

+3.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.18%

-20.45%

+11.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.26%

-20.45%

+3.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.26%

-35.74%

+10.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.07%

-44.28%

+8.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.18%

-20.45%

+12.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.22%

-14.30%

+4.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.16%

9.35%

-5.19%

Volatility

XLU vs. NFG - Volatility Comparison

State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and National Fuel Gas Company (NFG) have volatilities of 5.60% and 5.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLUNFGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.60%

5.75%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.70%

14.13%

-2.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.64%

19.83%

-5.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.34%

22.24%

-4.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.27%

24.05%

-4.78%

Dividends

XLU vs. NFG - Dividend Comparison

XLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, less than NFG's 2.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NFG
National Fuel Gas Company
2.80%2.65%3.36%3.91%2.97%2.83%4.30%3.72%3.30%3.00%2.84%3.67%
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.73%2.71%2.96%3.39%2.92%2.79%3.14%2.95%3.33%3.33%3.41%3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLU and NFG have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NFG has higher volatility (5.75%) compared to XLU (5.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLU dropped -51.98% vs NFG's -55.49%.

XLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.70 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLU and NFG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer