XLP vs. LRN
XLP (State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Consumer Staples Select Sector Index, while LRN (Stride, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, XLP returned 7.21%/yr vs 23.53%/yr for LRN. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XLP vs. LRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLP achieves a 7.54% return, which is significantly lower than LRN's 48.98% return. Over the past 10 years, XLP has underperformed LRN with an annualized return of 7.21%, while LRN has yielded a comparatively higher 23.53% annualized return.
XLP
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -1.32%
- YTD
- 7.54%
- 6M
- 8.22%
- 1Y
- 4.50%
- 3Y*
- 7.23%
- 5Y*
- 6.10%
- 10Y*
- 7.21%
LRN
- 1D
- -3.28%
- 1M
- 10.01%
- YTD
- 48.98%
- 6M
- 57.26%
- 1Y
- -33.50%
- 3Y*
- 32.84%
- 5Y*
- 26.64%
- 10Y*
- 23.53%
XLP vs. LRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 7.54% | 1.52% | 12.20% | -0.82% | -0.81% | 17.20% | 10.11% | 27.43% | -8.07% | 12.98% |
LRN Stride, Inc. | 48.98% | -37.53% | 75.05% | 89.80% | -6.15% | 56.99% | 4.32% | -17.91% | 55.91% | -7.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLP and LRN is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2007 | 0.22 |
The correlation between XLP and LRN shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (3 years) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLP vs. LRN — Risk / Return Rank
XLP
LRN
XLP vs. LRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) and Stride, Inc. (LRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLP | LRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 0.96 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.47 | -0.52 | +0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.91 | -0.80 | +1.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLP | LRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 | -0.50 | +0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.52 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.48 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.15 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
XLP vs. LRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLP drawdown since its inception was -35.90%, smaller than the maximum LRN drawdown of -81.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLP and LRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLP | LRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.90% | -81.41% | +45.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.69% | -64.07% | +54.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.39% | -64.07% | +51.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.30% | -64.07% | +47.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.51% | -64.07% | +39.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.19% | -43.04% | +35.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.06% | -36.28% | +29.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.97% | 41.77% | -36.80% |
Volatility
XLP vs. LRN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) is 4.30%, while Stride, Inc. (LRN) has a volatility of 8.89%. This indicates that XLP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLP | LRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.30% | 8.89% | -4.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.97% | 24.18% | -14.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.75% | 66.84% | -54.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.31% | 51.40% | -38.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.74% | 49.23% | -34.49% |
Dividends
XLP vs. LRN - Dividend Comparison
XLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, while LRN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRN Stride, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.62% | 2.75% | 2.77% | 2.63% | 2.47% | 2.28% | 2.50% | 2.57% | 3.04% | 2.62% | 2.53% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLP and LRN have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LRN has higher volatility (8.89%) compared to XLP (4.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLP dropped -35.90% vs LRN's -81.41%.
XLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.36 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLP and LRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer