XLP vs. GPIQ
XLP (State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF) and GPIQ (Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLP is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Consumer Staples Select Sector Index, while GPIQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs. XLP is passively managed, while GPIQ is actively managed. Over the past year, XLP returned 4.50% vs 33.04% for GPIQ. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLP charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for GPIQ.
Performance
XLP vs. GPIQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLP achieves a 7.54% return, which is significantly lower than GPIQ's 14.88% return.
XLP
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -1.32%
- YTD
- 7.54%
- 6M
- 8.22%
- 1Y
- 4.50%
- 3Y*
- 7.23%
- 5Y*
- 6.10%
- 10Y*
- 7.21%
GPIQ
- 1D
- 1.46%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- 14.88%
- 6M
- 14.06%
- 1Y
- 33.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLP vs. GPIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 7.54% | 1.52% | 12.20% | 6.82% |
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF | 14.88% | 19.77% | 23.22% | 15.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLP and GPIQ is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2023 | 0.07 |
The correlation between XLP and GPIQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLP vs. GPIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLP
GPIQ
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
XLP
GPIQ
Consumer Cyclical
XLP
GPIQ
Basic Materials
XLP
-
GPIQ
Communication Services
XLP
-
GPIQ
Energy
XLP
-
GPIQ
Financial Services
XLP
-
GPIQ
Healthcare
XLP
-
GPIQ
Industrials
XLP
-
GPIQ
Real Estate
XLP
-
GPIQ
Technology
XLP
-
GPIQ
Utilities
XLP
-
GPIQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLP vs. GPIQ — Risk / Return Rank
XLP
GPIQ
XLP vs. GPIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLP | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.43 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.47 | 3.49 | -3.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.91 | 15.21 | -14.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLP | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 | 2.36 | -2.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 1.67 | -1.24 |
Drawdowns
XLP vs. GPIQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLP drawdown since its inception was -35.90%, which is greater than GPIQ's maximum drawdown of -21.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLP and GPIQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLP | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.90% | -21.06% | -14.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.69% | -9.51% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.19% | -3.08% | -4.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.06% | -2.27% | -4.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.97% | 2.18% | +2.79% |
Volatility
XLP vs. GPIQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) is 4.30%, while Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) has a volatility of 5.54%. This indicates that XLP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GPIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLP | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.30% | 5.54% | -1.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.97% | 11.32% | -1.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.75% | 14.07% | -1.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.31% | 17.63% | -4.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.74% | 17.63% | -2.89% |
XLP vs. GPIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLP has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than GPIQ's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLP vs. GPIQ - Dividend Comparison
XLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, less than GPIQ's 9.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF | 9.60% | 9.81% | 9.18% | 1.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.62% | 2.75% | 2.77% | 2.63% | 2.47% | 2.28% | 2.50% | 2.57% | 3.04% | 2.62% | 2.53% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLP and GPIQ have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GPIQ has higher volatility (5.54%) compared to XLP (4.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLP dropped -35.90% vs GPIQ's -21.06%.
On 1-year performance, GPIQ leads with 33.04% vs 4.50% for XLP. On fees, XLP is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLP has been the lower-risk option at 4.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GPIQ has performed better with a 33.04% return vs 4.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLP is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for GPIQ.
GPIQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.60%, compared with 2.62% for XLP.
XLP is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while GPIQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLP and 0.29% for GPIQ.
GPIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLP and GPIQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer