PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLKS.L vs. QDVE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLKS.L vs. QDVE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLKS.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (QDVE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XLKS.L is traded in USD, while QDVE.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the QDVE.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLKS.L achieves a 19.36% return, which is significantly lower than QDVE.DE's 22.62% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XLKS.L having a 25.85% annualized return and QDVE.DE not far ahead at 26.32%.


XLKS.L

1D
-0.29%
1M
4.38%
YTD
19.36%
6M
17.34%
1Y
47.19%
3Y*
35.42%
5Y*
24.29%
10Y*
25.85%

QDVE.DE

1D
-2.15%
1M
7.34%
YTD
22.62%
6M
20.94%
1Y
51.25%
3Y*
34.37%
5Y*
24.16%
10Y*
26.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLKS.L vs. QDVE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLKS.L
Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc
19.36%24.23%41.72%60.64%-29.12%34.73%42.78%48.83%-2.51%33.27%
QDVE.DE
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF
22.62%24.17%37.76%59.01%-29.92%35.19%42.37%50.61%-1.81%38.11%

Correlation

The correlation between XLKS.L and QDVE.DE is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2015

0.93

The correlation between XLKS.L and QDVE.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLKS.L vs. QDVE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLKS.L
XLKS.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
XLKS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLKS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLKS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
XLKS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLKS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

QDVE.DE
QDVE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
QDVE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLKS.L vs. QDVE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLKS.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (QDVE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLKS.LQDVE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.40

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

3.13

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.23

9.51

-1.28

XLKS.L vs. QDVE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLKS.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the QDVE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLKS.L and QDVE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLKS.LQDVE.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

2.53

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

1.02

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.17

1.19

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.00

1.11

-0.11

Drawdowns

XLKS.L vs. QDVE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLKS.L drawdown since its inception was -34.26%, roughly equal to the maximum QDVE.DE drawdown of -33.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLKS.L and QDVE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLKS.LQDVE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.26%

-33.62%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.99%

-16.47%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.97%

-26.14%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.26%

-33.62%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.26%

-33.62%

-0.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.42%

-3.24%

-3.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.12%

-5.95%

+0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.72%

5.43%

+0.29%

Volatility

XLKS.L vs. QDVE.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLKS.L) has a higher volatility of 8.05% compared to iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (QDVE.DE) at 7.19%. This indicates that XLKS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDVE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLKS.LQDVE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.05%

7.19%

+0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.89%

15.24%

+0.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.47%

20.38%

+0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.82%

23.40%

+0.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.07%

22.02%

+0.05%

XLKS.L vs. QDVE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLKS.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than QDVE.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLKS.L vs. QDVE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XLKS.L nor QDVE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, XLKS.L and QDVE.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XLKS.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLKS.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QDVE.DE.

XLKS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index, while QDVE.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLKS.L and 0.15% for QDVE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLKS.L and QDVE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer