XLKQ.L vs. LYBK.DE
XLKQ.L (Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc) and LYBK.DE (Amundi Euro Stoxx Banks UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - XLKQ.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index, while LYBK.DE is a Financials Equities fund tracking the EURO STOXX® Banks. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLKQ.L returned 26.77%/yr vs 16.75%/yr for LYBK.DE. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLKQ.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for LYBK.DE.
Performance
XLKQ.L vs. LYBK.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XLKQ.L is traded in GBp, while LYBK.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LYBK.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLKQ.L achieves a 20.44% return, which is significantly higher than LYBK.DE's 3.13% return. Over the past 10 years, XLKQ.L has outperformed LYBK.DE with an annualized return of 26.77%, while LYBK.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 16.75% annualized return.
XLKQ.L
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 6.65%
- YTD
- 20.44%
- 6M
- 17.20%
- 1Y
- 49.26%
- 3Y*
- 32.80%
- 5Y*
- 25.71%
- 10Y*
- 26.77%
LYBK.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.49%
- YTD
- 3.13%
- 6M
- 9.44%
- 1Y
- 40.27%
- 3Y*
- 45.31%
- 5Y*
- 29.15%
- 10Y*
- 16.75%
XLKQ.L vs. LYBK.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc | 20.44% | 15.76% | 44.03% | 51.84% | -20.58% | 36.28% | 37.93% | 44.38% | 2.54% | 21.82% |
LYBK.DE Amundi Euro Stoxx Banks UCITS ETF Acc | 3.13% | 101.42% | 24.85% | 27.74% | 6.30% | 30.09% | -18.06% | 11.62% | -29.89% | 19.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLKQ.L and LYBK.DE is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2013 | 0.33 |
The correlation between XLKQ.L and LYBK.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (3 years) to 0.37 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLKQ.L vs. LYBK.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XLKQ.L
LYBK.DE
XLKQ.L vs. LYBK.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) and Amundi Euro Stoxx Banks UCITS ETF Acc (LYBK.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLKQ.L | LYBK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.28 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 2.39 | +0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.59 | 7.66 | -0.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLKQ.L | LYBK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53 | 1.68 | +0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | 1.12 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.14 | 0.60 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.37 | +0.43 |
Drawdowns
XLKQ.L vs. LYBK.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLKQ.L drawdown since its inception was -38.43%, smaller than the maximum LYBK.DE drawdown of -62.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLKQ.L and LYBK.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLKQ.L | LYBK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.43% | -62.20% | +23.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.76% | -16.71% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.74% | -18.30% | -10.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.74% | -34.46% | +5.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.74% | -62.20% | +33.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.48% | -2.85% | -2.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.08% | -19.48% | +11.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.47% | 5.21% | +1.26% |
Volatility
XLKQ.L vs. LYBK.DE - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) has a higher volatility of 7.40% compared to Amundi Euro Stoxx Banks UCITS ETF Acc (LYBK.DE) at 5.70%. This indicates that XLKQ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYBK.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLKQ.L | LYBK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.40% | 5.70% | +1.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.52% | 19.09% | -4.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.43% | 23.67% | -4.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.15% | 25.68% | +0.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.38% | 27.87% | -4.49% |
XLKQ.L vs. LYBK.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLKQ.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than LYBK.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLKQ.L vs. LYBK.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XLKQ.L nor LYBK.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XLKQ.L and LYBK.DE have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLKQ.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLKQ.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LYBK.DE.
XLKQ.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while LYBK.DE is Financials Equities. XLKQ.L tracks S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index, while LYBK.DE tracks EURO STOXX® Banks. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLKQ.L and 0.30% for LYBK.DE.
Find the right allocation for XLKQ.L and LYBK.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer