XLKQ.L vs. GC=F
XLKQ.L (Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc) is Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index, while GC=F (Gold Futures) is an asset. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
XLKQ.L vs. GC=F - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XLKQ.L is traded in GBp, while GC=F is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GC=F values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
XLKQ.L
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 6.65%
- YTD
- 20.44%
- 6M
- 17.20%
- 1Y
- 49.26%
- 3Y*
- 32.80%
- 5Y*
- 25.71%
- 10Y*
- 26.77%
GC=F
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLKQ.L vs. GC=F - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc | 20.44% | 15.76% | 44.03% | 51.84% | -10.51% |
GC=F Gold Futures | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 14.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLKQ.L and GC=F is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2022 | -0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLKQ.L vs. GC=F — Risk / Return Rank
XLKQ.L
GC=F
XLKQ.L vs. GC=F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) and Gold Futures (GC=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLKQ.L | GC=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.59 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLKQ.L | GC=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.14 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | — | — |
Drawdowns
XLKQ.L vs. GC=F - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLKQ.L | GC=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.48% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.08% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.47% | — | — |
Volatility
XLKQ.L vs. GC=F - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLKQ.L | GC=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.40% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.52% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.43% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.15% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.38% | — | — |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLKQ.L and GC=F have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for XLKQ.L and GC=F
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer