PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLKQ.L vs. FLXI.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLKQ.L vs. FLXI.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) and Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF (FLXI.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XLKQ.L is traded in GBp, while FLXI.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the FLXI.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLKQ.L achieves a 20.44% return, which is significantly higher than FLXI.DE's -10.65% return.


XLKQ.L

1D
-0.03%
1M
6.65%
YTD
20.44%
6M
17.20%
1Y
49.26%
3Y*
32.80%
5Y*
25.71%
10Y*
26.77%

FLXI.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.83%
YTD
-10.65%
6M
-10.38%
1Y
-11.37%
3Y*
4.06%
5Y*
5.26%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLKQ.L vs. FLXI.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XLKQ.L
Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc
20.44%15.76%44.03%51.84%-20.58%36.28%37.93%13.79%
FLXI.DE
Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF
-10.65%-3.97%11.87%14.94%3.58%25.96%7.62%-3.61%

Correlation

The correlation between XLKQ.L and FLXI.DE is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2019

0.35

The correlation between XLKQ.L and FLXI.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (3 years) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLKQ.L vs. FLXI.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLKQ.L
XLKQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

FLXI.DE
FLXI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FLXI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLKQ.L vs. FLXI.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) and Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF (FLXI.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLKQ.LFLXI.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

0.88

+0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

-0.66

+3.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.59

-1.44

+9.03

XLKQ.L vs. FLXI.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is higher than the FLXI.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLKQ.L and FLXI.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLKQ.LFLXI.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

-0.79

+3.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

0.33

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.30

+0.50

Drawdowns

XLKQ.L vs. FLXI.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLKQ.L drawdown since its inception was -38.43%, roughly equal to the maximum FLXI.DE drawdown of -36.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLKQ.L and FLXI.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLKQ.LFLXI.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.43%

-36.63%

-1.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.76%

-17.68%

+0.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.74%

-22.12%

-6.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.74%

-22.12%

-6.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.48%

-19.42%

+13.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.08%

-7.20%

-0.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.47%

8.07%

-1.60%

Volatility

XLKQ.L vs. FLXI.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) has a higher volatility of 7.40% compared to Franklin FTSE India UCITS ETF (FLXI.DE) at 5.10%. This indicates that XLKQ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLXI.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLKQ.LFLXI.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.40%

5.10%

+2.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.52%

12.34%

+2.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.43%

14.67%

+4.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.15%

15.75%

+10.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.38%

19.55%

+3.83%

XLKQ.L vs. FLXI.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLKQ.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than FLXI.DE's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLKQ.L vs. FLXI.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XLKQ.L nor FLXI.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XLKQ.L and FLXI.DE have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLKQ.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLKQ.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for FLXI.DE.

XLKQ.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while FLXI.DE is Asia Pacific Equities. XLKQ.L tracks S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index, while FLXI.DE tracks FTSE India 30/18 Capped. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLKQ.L and 0.19% for FLXI.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLKQ.L and FLXI.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer