PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLK vs. XLKS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLK vs. XLKS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLKS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLK achieves a 28.09% return, which is significantly higher than XLKS.L's 19.36% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XLK having a 25.04% annualized return and XLKS.L not far ahead at 25.85%.


XLK

1D
2.15%
1M
4.93%
YTD
28.09%
6M
25.10%
1Y
55.42%
3Y*
31.33%
5Y*
22.26%
10Y*
25.04%

XLKS.L

1D
-0.29%
1M
4.38%
YTD
19.36%
6M
17.34%
1Y
47.19%
3Y*
35.42%
5Y*
24.29%
10Y*
25.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLK vs. XLKS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
28.09%24.61%21.63%56.02%-27.73%34.74%43.62%49.86%-1.68%34.26%
XLKS.L
Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc
19.36%24.23%41.72%60.64%-29.12%34.73%42.78%48.83%-2.51%33.27%

Correlation

The correlation between XLK and XLKS.L is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2009

0.60

The correlation between XLK and XLKS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (all time) to 0.74 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XLK vs. XLKS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLK
XLKS.L

Technology

99.7%
91.2%

Energy

0.2%

-

Industrials

0.1%
1.5%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

7.3%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

XLK
99.7%
XLKS.L
91.2%

Energy

XLK
0.2%
XLKS.L

-

Industrials

XLK
0.1%
XLKS.L
1.5%

Basic Materials

XLK

-

XLKS.L

-

Communication Services

XLK

-

XLKS.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

XLK

-

XLKS.L

-

Consumer Defensive

XLK

-

XLKS.L

-

Financial Services

XLK

-

XLKS.L
7.3%

Healthcare

XLK

-

XLKS.L

-

Real Estate

XLK

-

XLKS.L

-

Utilities

XLK

-

XLKS.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLK vs. XLKS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLK
XLK Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

XLKS.L
XLKS.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
XLKS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLKS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLKS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
XLKS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLKS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLK vs. XLKS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLKS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLKXLKS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.38

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.50

2.76

+0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.58

8.23

+3.35

XLK vs. XLKS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLK Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the XLKS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLK and XLKS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLKXLKS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

2.30

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

1.02

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.02

1.17

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

1.00

-0.60

Drawdowns

XLK vs. XLKS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLK drawdown since its inception was -82.05%, which is greater than XLKS.L's maximum drawdown of -34.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLK and XLKS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLKXLKS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.05%

-34.26%

-47.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.92%

-16.99%

+1.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.66%

-26.97%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.56%

-34.26%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.56%

-34.26%

+0.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.08%

-6.42%

-0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.95%

-5.12%

-29.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.80%

5.72%

-0.92%

Volatility

XLK vs. XLKS.L - Volatility Comparison

State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a higher volatility of 10.42% compared to Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLKS.L) at 8.05%. This indicates that XLK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLKS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLKXLKS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.42%

8.05%

+2.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.32%

15.89%

+2.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.08%

20.47%

+1.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.10%

23.82%

+1.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.60%

22.07%

+2.53%

XLK vs. XLKS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLK has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than XLKS.L's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLK vs. XLKS.L - Dividend Comparison

XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, while XLKS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
0.41%0.54%0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%
XLKS.L
Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLK and XLKS.L have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for XLKS.L.

XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while XLKS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLK and 0.14% for XLKS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLK and XLKS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer