XLK vs. VONG

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) and VONG (Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while VONG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLK returned 25.04%/yr vs 18.32%/yr for VONG. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XLK charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VONG.

Performance

XLK vs. VONG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLK achieves a 28.09% return, which is significantly higher than VONG's 4.12% return. Over the past 10 years, XLK has outperformed VONG with an annualized return of 25.04%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively lower 18.32% annualized return.

XLK

• 1D: 2.15%
• 1M: 4.93%
• YTD: 28.09%
• 6M: 25.10%
• 1Y: 55.42%
• 3Y*: 31.33%
• 5Y*: 22.26%
• 10Y*: 25.04%

VONG

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: -0.46%
• YTD: 4.12%
• 6M: 3.06%
• 1Y: 21.24%
• 3Y*: 23.77%
• 5Y*: 14.57%
• 10Y*: 18.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLK vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF	28.09%	24.61%	21.63%	56.02%	-27.73%	34.74%	43.62%	49.86%	-1.68%	34.26%
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF	4.12%	18.45%	33.20%	42.67%	-29.18%	27.60%	38.30%	36.06%	-1.53%	30.05%

Correlation

The correlation between XLK and VONG is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010	0.93

The correlation between XLK and VONG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

XLK vs. VONG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XLK	VONG
Technology	99.7%	51.4%
Energy	0.2%	0.4%
Industrials	0.1%	5.7%
Basic Materials	-	0.3%
Communication Services	-	13.2%
Consumer Cyclical	-	13.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	2.7%
Financial Services	-	5.3%
Healthcare	-	7.1%
Real Estate	-	0.4%
Utilities	-	0.3%

Return for Risk

XLK vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLK

XLK Risk / Return Rank: 77
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 79
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 69

VONG

VONG Risk / Return Rank: 37
VONG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
VONG Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
VONG Omega Ratio Rank: 41
VONG Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
VONG Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLK vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XLK	VONG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.53	1.36	+1.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.06	1.87	+1.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.24	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.50	1.31	+2.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.58	4.39	+7.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XLK vs. VONG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLK Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is higher than the VONG Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLK and VONG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XLK	VONG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.53	1.36	+1.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89	0.69	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.02	0.88	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.89	-0.48

Drawdowns

XLK vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLK drawdown since its inception was -82.05%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLK and VONG.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLK	VONG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.05%	-32.72%	-49.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.92%	-16.23%	+0.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.66%	-23.27%	-2.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.56%	-32.72%	-0.84%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.56%	-32.72%	-0.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.08%	-4.47%	-2.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.95%	-4.88%	-30.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.80%	4.85%	-0.05%

Volatility

XLK vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison

State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a higher volatility of 10.42% compared to Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) at 4.78%. This indicates that XLK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLK	VONG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.42%	4.78%	+5.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.32%	12.08%	+6.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.08%	15.71%	+6.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.10%	21.38%	+3.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.60%	20.90%	+3.70%

XLK vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLK has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VONG's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XLK vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison

XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than VONG's 0.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF	0.44%	0.45%	0.55%	0.71%	0.98%	0.58%	0.77%	1.03%	1.18%	1.19%	1.48%	1.47%
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF	0.41%	0.54%	0.66%	0.76%	1.04%	0.65%	0.92%	1.16%	1.60%	1.37%	1.74%	1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLK and VONG in my portfolio?

XLK and VONG have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XLK or VONG?

XLK has higher volatility (10.42%) compared to VONG (4.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLK dropped -82.05% vs VONG's -32.72%.

Which ETF is better, XLK or VONG?

On 10-year performance, XLK leads with 25.04% vs 18.32% for VONG. On fees, VONG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VONG has been the lower-risk option at 4.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XLK or VONG?

Over the 10-year period, XLK has performed better with a 25.04% return vs 18.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLK or VONG?

VONG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XLK or VONG?

VONG has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.41% for XLK.

What is the main difference between XLK and VONG?

XLK is categorized as Technology Equities, while VONG is Large Cap Growth Equities. XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while VONG tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLK and 0.06% for VONG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.