PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLK vs. VIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLK vs. VIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLK achieves a 28.09% return, which is significantly higher than VIG's 6.58% return. Over the past 10 years, XLK has outperformed VIG with an annualized return of 25.04%, while VIG has yielded a comparatively lower 13.05% annualized return.


XLK

1D
2.15%
1M
4.93%
YTD
28.09%
6M
25.10%
1Y
55.42%
3Y*
31.33%
5Y*
22.26%
10Y*
25.04%

VIG

1D
0.03%
1M
2.32%
YTD
6.58%
6M
6.47%
1Y
18.31%
3Y*
16.04%
5Y*
10.62%
10Y*
13.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLK vs. VIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
28.09%24.61%21.63%56.02%-27.73%34.74%43.62%49.86%-1.68%34.26%
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
6.58%14.17%16.99%14.51%-9.80%23.76%15.43%29.62%-2.08%22.22%

Correlation

The correlation between XLK and VIG is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2006

0.78

The correlation between XLK and VIG shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XLK vs. VIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLK
VIG

Technology

99.7%
26.2%

Energy

0.2%
3.5%

Industrials

0.1%
11.8%

Basic Materials

-

3.5%

Communication Services

-

0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

4.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

10.1%

Financial Services

-

20.6%

Healthcare

-

16.5%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

3.2%

Technology

XLK
99.7%
VIG
26.2%

Energy

XLK
0.2%
VIG
3.5%

Industrials

XLK
0.1%
VIG
11.8%

Basic Materials

XLK

-

VIG
3.5%

Communication Services

XLK

-

VIG
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

XLK

-

VIG
4.7%

Consumer Defensive

XLK

-

VIG
10.1%

Financial Services

XLK

-

VIG
20.6%

Healthcare

XLK

-

VIG
16.5%

Real Estate

XLK

-

VIG

-

Utilities

XLK

-

VIG
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLK vs. VIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLK
XLK Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

VIG
VIG Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
VIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIG Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
VIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIG Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLK vs. VIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLKVIGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.33

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.50

2.33

+1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.58

9.37

+2.21

XLK vs. VIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLK Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is higher than the VIG Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLK and VIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLKVIGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

1.82

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

0.75

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.02

0.82

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.60

-0.19

Drawdowns

XLK vs. VIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLK drawdown since its inception was -82.05%, which is greater than VIG's maximum drawdown of -46.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLK and VIG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLKVIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.05%

-46.81%

-35.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.92%

-7.91%

-8.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.66%

-14.95%

-10.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.56%

-20.39%

-13.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.56%

-31.72%

-1.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.08%

-1.34%

-5.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.95%

-5.51%

-29.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.80%

1.96%

+2.84%

Volatility

XLK vs. VIG - Volatility Comparison

State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a higher volatility of 10.42% compared to Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) at 2.42%. This indicates that XLK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLKVIGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.42%

2.42%

+8.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.32%

7.68%

+10.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.08%

10.10%

+11.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.10%

14.24%

+10.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.60%

16.06%

+8.54%

XLK vs. VIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLK has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VIG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLK vs. VIG - Dividend Comparison

XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than VIG's 1.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
1.48%1.62%1.73%1.88%1.96%1.55%1.63%1.71%2.08%1.88%2.14%2.34%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
0.41%0.54%0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLK and VIG have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLK has higher volatility (10.42%) compared to VIG (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLK dropped -82.05% vs VIG's -46.81%.

On 10-year performance, XLK leads with 25.04% vs 13.05% for VIG. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLK has performed better with a 25.04% return vs 13.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLK.

VIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.48%, compared with 0.41% for XLK.

XLK is categorized as Technology Equities, while VIG is Dividend. XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while VIG tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLK and 0.04% for VIG.

XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLK and VIG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer