PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLI vs. IVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLI vs. IVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLI achieves a 12.25% return, which is significantly higher than IVV's 8.72% return. Over the past 10 years, XLI has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of 13.86%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.32% annualized return.


XLI

1D
-0.32%
1M
0.25%
YTD
12.25%
6M
13.16%
1Y
21.42%
3Y*
21.04%
5Y*
12.54%
10Y*
13.86%

IVV

1D
0.24%
1M
0.23%
YTD
8.72%
6M
8.76%
1Y
24.89%
3Y*
21.44%
5Y*
13.50%
10Y*
15.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLI vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLI
Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund
12.25%19.35%17.31%18.13%-5.57%21.08%10.91%29.08%-13.25%23.98%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
8.72%17.85%24.93%26.31%-18.16%28.76%18.40%31.07%-4.49%21.75%

Correlation

The correlation between XLI and IVV is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2000

0.85

The correlation between XLI and IVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XLI vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLI
IVV

Industrials

90.7%
8.3%

Utilities

4.8%
2.4%

Technology

4.0%
35.6%

Consumer Cyclical

0.5%
10.1%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Communication Services

-

11.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Energy

-

3.5%

Financial Services

-

11.8%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Industrials

XLI
90.7%
IVV
8.3%

Utilities

XLI
4.8%
IVV
2.4%

Technology

XLI
4.0%
IVV
35.6%

Consumer Cyclical

XLI
0.5%
IVV
10.1%

Basic Materials

XLI

-

IVV
1.8%

Communication Services

XLI

-

IVV
11.2%

Consumer Defensive

XLI

-

IVV
4.9%

Energy

XLI

-

IVV
3.5%

Financial Services

XLI

-

IVV
11.8%

Healthcare

XLI

-

IVV
8.5%

Real Estate

XLI

-

IVV
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLI vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLI
XLI Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
XLI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLI Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
XLI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLI Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLI vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLIIVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.38

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

2.81

-1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.97

12.97

-6.00

XLI vs. IVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLI Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the IVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLI and IVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLIIVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

2.07

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.80

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.85

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.45

0.00

Drawdowns

XLI vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLI drawdown since its inception was -62.26%, which is greater than IVV's maximum drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLI and IVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLIIVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.26%

-55.25%

-7.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.21%

-8.89%

-3.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.49%

-18.75%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.64%

-24.53%

+2.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.33%

-33.90%

-8.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.67%

-2.67%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.20%

-10.77%

+1.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.08%

1.92%

+1.16%

Volatility

XLI vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison

Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) has a higher volatility of 3.98% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 3.77%. This indicates that XLI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLIIVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.98%

3.77%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.84%

9.31%

+3.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.47%

12.08%

+3.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.43%

16.92%

+0.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.99%

18.07%

+1.92%

XLI vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLI has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLI vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison

XLI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, more than IVV's 1.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.09%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%
XLI
Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund
1.18%1.29%1.44%1.63%1.63%1.25%1.55%1.94%2.15%1.77%2.07%2.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLI and IVV have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLI has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to IVV (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLI dropped -62.26% vs IVV's -55.25%.

On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.32% vs 13.86% for XLI. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 3.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.32% return vs 13.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLI.

XLI has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 1.09% for IVV.

XLI is categorized as Industrials Equities, while IVV is S&P 500. XLI tracks Industrial Select Sector Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLI and 0.03% for IVV.

IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLI and IVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer