XLI vs. IVV
XLI (Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund) and IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLI is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Industrial Select Sector Index, while IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLI returned 13.86%/yr vs 15.32%/yr for IVV. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XLI charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for IVV.
Performance
XLI vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLI achieves a 12.25% return, which is significantly higher than IVV's 8.72% return. Over the past 10 years, XLI has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of 13.86%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.32% annualized return.
XLI
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 12.25%
- 6M
- 13.16%
- 1Y
- 21.42%
- 3Y*
- 21.04%
- 5Y*
- 12.54%
- 10Y*
- 13.86%
IVV
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 8.72%
- 6M
- 8.76%
- 1Y
- 24.89%
- 3Y*
- 21.44%
- 5Y*
- 13.50%
- 10Y*
- 15.32%
XLI vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 12.25% | 19.35% | 17.31% | 18.13% | -5.57% | 21.08% | 10.91% | 29.08% | -13.25% | 23.98% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 8.72% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 18.40% | 31.07% | -4.49% | 21.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLI and IVV is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2000 | 0.85 |
The correlation between XLI and IVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLI vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLI
IVV
Industrials
Utilities
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
XLI
IVV
Utilities
XLI
IVV
Technology
XLI
IVV
Consumer Cyclical
XLI
IVV
Basic Materials
XLI
-
IVV
Communication Services
XLI
-
IVV
Consumer Defensive
XLI
-
IVV
Energy
XLI
-
IVV
Financial Services
XLI
-
IVV
Healthcare
XLI
-
IVV
Real Estate
XLI
-
IVV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLI vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank
XLI
IVV
XLI vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLI | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.38 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 2.81 | -1.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.97 | 12.97 | -6.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLI | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 2.07 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.80 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.85 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
XLI vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLI drawdown since its inception was -62.26%, which is greater than IVV's maximum drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLI and IVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLI | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.26% | -55.25% | -7.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.21% | -8.89% | -3.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.49% | -18.75% | +0.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.64% | -24.53% | +2.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.33% | -33.90% | -8.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.67% | -2.67% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.20% | -10.77% | +1.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.08% | 1.92% | +1.16% |
Volatility
XLI vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) has a higher volatility of 3.98% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 3.77%. This indicates that XLI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLI | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.98% | 3.77% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.84% | 9.31% | +3.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.47% | 12.08% | +3.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.43% | 16.92% | +0.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.99% | 18.07% | +1.92% |
XLI vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLI has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLI vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
XLI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, more than IVV's 1.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.09% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.18% | 1.29% | 1.44% | 1.63% | 1.63% | 1.25% | 1.55% | 1.94% | 2.15% | 1.77% | 2.07% | 2.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLI and IVV have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLI has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to IVV (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLI dropped -62.26% vs IVV's -55.25%.
On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.32% vs 13.86% for XLI. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 3.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.32% return vs 13.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLI.
XLI has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 1.09% for IVV.
XLI is categorized as Industrials Equities, while IVV is S&P 500. XLI tracks Industrial Select Sector Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLI and 0.03% for IVV.
IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLI and IVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer