PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLF vs. HEI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLF vs. HEI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) and HEICO Corporation (HEI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLF achieves a -4.62% return, which is significantly lower than HEI's 0.01% return. Over the past 10 years, XLF has underperformed HEI with an annualized return of 12.79%, while HEI has yielded a comparatively higher 25.42% annualized return.


XLF

1D
-0.63%
1M
1.42%
YTD
-4.62%
6M
-1.98%
1Y
2.91%
3Y*
18.06%
5Y*
8.47%
10Y*
12.79%

HEI

1D
-2.39%
1M
10.59%
YTD
0.01%
6M
2.87%
1Y
6.72%
3Y*
25.63%
5Y*
17.50%
10Y*
25.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLF vs. HEI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLF
State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF
-4.62%14.90%30.56%12.03%-10.59%34.80%-1.74%31.88%-13.06%22.00%
HEI
HEICO Corporation
0.01%36.22%33.05%16.56%6.67%9.06%16.16%47.54%28.51%53.04%

Correlation

The correlation between XLF and HEI is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998

0.42

The correlation between XLF and HEI shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLF vs. HEI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLF
XLF Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
XLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLF Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
XLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLF Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

HEI
HEI Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
HEI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEI Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
HEI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEI Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLF vs. HEI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) and HEICO Corporation (HEI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLFHEIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.07

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.20

0.25

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.51

0.60

-0.09

XLF vs. HEI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLF Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is comparable to the HEI Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLF and HEI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLFHEIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

0.21

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.64

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.83

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.51

-0.31

Drawdowns

XLF vs. HEI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLF drawdown since its inception was -82.69%, which is greater than HEI's maximum drawdown of -75.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLF and HEI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLFHEIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.69%

-75.50%

-7.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.79%

-27.11%

+12.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.54%

-27.11%

+11.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.81%

-27.11%

+1.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.86%

-57.73%

+14.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.38%

-9.65%

+2.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.02%

-19.96%

-0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.71%

11.14%

-5.43%

Volatility

XLF vs. HEI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) is 4.20%, while HEICO Corporation (HEI) has a volatility of 13.61%. This indicates that XLF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HEI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLFHEIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.20%

13.61%

-9.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.18%

27.21%

-16.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.61%

32.79%

-18.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.66%

27.59%

-8.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.18%

30.61%

-8.43%

Dividends

XLF vs. HEI - Dividend Comparison

XLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, more than HEI's 0.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HEI
HEICO Corporation
0.07%0.07%0.09%0.11%0.12%0.12%0.12%0.12%0.14%0.08%0.22%0.28%
XLF
State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.52%1.31%1.42%1.71%2.04%1.63%2.03%1.87%2.08%1.48%21.10%1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLF and HEI have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HEI has higher volatility (13.61%) compared to XLF (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLF dropped -82.69% vs HEI's -75.50%.

HEI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.21 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLF and HEI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer