PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLF vs. BRK-B
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLF vs. BRK-B - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLF achieves a -4.62% return, which is significantly lower than BRK-B's -3.11% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XLF having a 12.79% annualized return and BRK-B not far ahead at 13.14%.


XLF

1D
-0.63%
1M
1.42%
YTD
-4.62%
6M
-1.98%
1Y
2.91%
3Y*
18.06%
5Y*
8.47%
10Y*
12.79%

BRK-B

1D
-0.23%
1M
2.32%
YTD
-3.11%
6M
-2.06%
1Y
-1.32%
3Y*
13.25%
5Y*
11.03%
10Y*
13.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLF vs. BRK-B - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLF
State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF
-4.62%14.90%30.56%12.03%-10.59%34.80%-1.74%31.88%-13.06%22.00%
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
-3.11%10.89%27.09%15.46%3.31%28.95%2.37%10.93%3.01%21.62%

Correlation

The correlation between XLF and BRK-B is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 1998

0.57

The correlation between XLF and BRK-B shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.80 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLF vs. BRK-B — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLF
XLF Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
XLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLF Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
XLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLF Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

BRK-B
BRK-B Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
BRK-B Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRK-B Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRK-B Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
BRK-B Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRK-B Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLF vs. BRK-B - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLFBRK-BDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.00

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.20

-0.14

+0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.51

-0.30

+0.81

XLF vs. BRK-B - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLF Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is higher than the BRK-B Sharpe Ratio of -0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLF and BRK-B, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLFBRK-BDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

-0.09

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.65

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.68

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.48

-0.28

Drawdowns

XLF vs. BRK-B - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLF drawdown since its inception was -82.69%, which is greater than BRK-B's maximum drawdown of -53.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLF and BRK-B.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLFBRK-BDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.69%

-53.86%

-28.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.79%

-9.42%

-5.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.54%

-14.95%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.81%

-26.58%

+0.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.86%

-29.57%

-13.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.38%

-9.78%

+2.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.02%

-11.07%

-8.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.71%

4.49%

+1.22%

Volatility

XLF vs. BRK-B - Volatility Comparison

State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) has a higher volatility of 4.20% compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) at 3.98%. This indicates that XLF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRK-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLFBRK-BDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.20%

3.98%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.18%

10.87%

+0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.61%

14.38%

+0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.66%

17.13%

+1.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.18%

19.44%

+2.74%

Dividends

XLF vs. BRK-B - Dividend Comparison

XLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, while BRK-B has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLF
State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.52%1.31%1.42%1.71%2.04%1.63%2.03%1.87%2.08%1.48%21.10%1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLF and BRK-B have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLF has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to BRK-B (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLF dropped -82.69% vs BRK-B's -53.86%.

XLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.20 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLF and BRK-B

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer