PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLE vs. PBP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLE vs. PBP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLE achieves a 31.32% return, which is significantly higher than PBP's 4.30% return. Over the past 10 years, XLE has outperformed PBP with an annualized return of 10.02%, while PBP has yielded a comparatively lower 7.06% annualized return.


XLE

1D
1.14%
1M
4.72%
YTD
31.32%
6M
30.37%
1Y
44.35%
3Y*
16.51%
5Y*
20.33%
10Y*
10.02%

PBP

1D
0.31%
1M
0.78%
YTD
4.30%
6M
5.70%
1Y
17.11%
3Y*
11.30%
5Y*
7.97%
10Y*
7.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLE vs. PBP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
31.32%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%11.74%-18.22%-0.89%
PBP
Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
4.30%8.49%19.83%11.59%-11.82%19.97%-3.31%14.60%-5.57%11.98%

Correlation

The correlation between XLE and PBP is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2007

0.47

Over the past year, the correlation between XLE and PBP has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XLE vs. PBP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLE
PBP

Energy

100.0%
3.3%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Communication Services

-

10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.7%

Financial Services

-

11.4%

Healthcare

-

8.6%

Industrials

-

7.8%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Technology

-

39.5%

Utilities

-

2.6%

Energy

XLE
100.0%
PBP
3.3%

Basic Materials

XLE

-

PBP
1.8%

Communication Services

XLE

-

PBP
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

XLE

-

PBP
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

XLE

-

PBP
4.7%

Financial Services

XLE

-

PBP
11.4%

Healthcare

XLE

-

PBP
8.6%

Industrials

XLE

-

PBP
7.8%

Real Estate

XLE

-

PBP
1.8%

Technology

XLE

-

PBP
39.5%

Utilities

XLE

-

PBP
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLE vs. PBP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

PBP
PBP Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
PBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBP Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
PBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBP Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLE vs. PBP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLEPBPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.55

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

3.29

+0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.59

17.37

-6.78

XLE vs. PBP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLE Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the PBP Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLE and PBP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLEPBPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

2.48

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.68

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.52

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.34

-0.03

Drawdowns

XLE vs. PBP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLE drawdown since its inception was -71.26%, which is greater than PBP's maximum drawdown of -43.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLE and PBP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLEPBPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.26%

-43.43%

-27.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.05%

-5.22%

-6.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.14%

-15.42%

-4.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

-18.61%

-7.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.81%

-33.31%

-33.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.76%

-0.74%

-6.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.98%

-6.69%

-11.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.20%

0.99%

+3.21%

Volatility

XLE vs. PBP - Volatility Comparison

State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a higher volatility of 7.07% compared to Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP) at 1.43%. This indicates that XLE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLEPBPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.07%

1.43%

+5.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.58%

5.62%

+10.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.48%

6.95%

+13.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.03%

11.87%

+14.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.58%

13.67%

+15.91%

XLE vs. PBP - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than PBP's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLE vs. PBP - Dividend Comparison

XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, less than PBP's 11.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PBP
Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
11.22%11.12%9.36%3.35%1.33%6.21%1.41%5.04%2.59%10.86%2.56%6.19%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.56%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLE and PBP have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLE has higher volatility (7.07%) compared to PBP (1.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLE dropped -71.26% vs PBP's -43.43%.

On 10-year performance, XLE leads with 10.02% vs 7.06% for PBP. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, PBP has been the lower-risk option at 1.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLE has performed better with a 10.02% return vs 7.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for PBP.

PBP has the higher dividend yield at 11.22%, compared with 2.56% for XLE.

XLE is categorized as Energy Equities, while PBP is Derivative Income. XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index, while PBP tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLE and 0.29% for PBP.

PBP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLE and PBP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer