XLE vs. JEPQ
XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) and JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index, while JEPQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XLE returned 16.51%/yr vs 20.04%/yr for JEPQ. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLE charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEPQ.
Performance
XLE vs. JEPQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLE achieves a 31.32% return, which is significantly higher than JEPQ's 7.44% return.
XLE
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- 4.72%
- YTD
- 31.32%
- 6M
- 30.37%
- 1Y
- 44.35%
- 3Y*
- 16.51%
- 5Y*
- 20.33%
- 10Y*
- 10.02%
JEPQ
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- 7.44%
- 6M
- 7.26%
- 1Y
- 25.85%
- 3Y*
- 20.04%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLE vs. JEPQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 31.32% | 7.88% | 5.56% | -0.63% | 10.50% |
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 7.44% | 15.18% | 24.85% | 36.28% | -12.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLE and JEPQ is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2022 | 0.17 |
The correlation between XLE and JEPQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLE vs. JEPQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLE
JEPQ
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
XLE
JEPQ
Basic Materials
XLE
-
JEPQ
Communication Services
XLE
-
JEPQ
Consumer Cyclical
XLE
-
JEPQ
Consumer Defensive
XLE
-
JEPQ
Financial Services
XLE
-
JEPQ
Healthcare
XLE
-
JEPQ
Industrials
XLE
-
JEPQ
Real Estate
XLE
-
JEPQ
Technology
XLE
-
JEPQ
Utilities
XLE
-
JEPQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLE vs. JEPQ — Risk / Return Rank
XLE
JEPQ
XLE vs. JEPQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLE | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.42 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | 2.95 | +0.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.59 | 14.33 | -3.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLE | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.18 | 2.13 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.96 | -0.66 |
Drawdowns
XLE vs. JEPQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLE drawdown since its inception was -71.26%, which is greater than JEPQ's maximum drawdown of -20.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLE and JEPQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLE | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.26% | -20.07% | -51.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.05% | -8.82% | -3.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.14% | -20.07% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.76% | -2.02% | -4.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.98% | -3.42% | -14.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.20% | 1.81% | +2.39% |
Volatility
XLE vs. JEPQ - Volatility Comparison
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a higher volatility of 7.07% compared to JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) at 3.65%. This indicates that XLE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLE | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.07% | 3.65% | +3.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.58% | 9.66% | +6.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.48% | 12.19% | +8.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.03% | 16.67% | +9.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.58% | 16.67% | +12.91% |
XLE vs. JEPQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than JEPQ's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLE vs. JEPQ - Dividend Comparison
XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, less than JEPQ's 10.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 10.26% | 10.53% | 9.65% | 10.03% | 9.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.56% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLE and JEPQ have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLE has higher volatility (7.07%) compared to JEPQ (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLE dropped -71.26% vs JEPQ's -20.07%.
On 3-year performance, JEPQ leads with 20.04% vs 16.51% for XLE. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, JEPQ has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, JEPQ has performed better with a 20.04% return vs 16.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for JEPQ.
JEPQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.26%, compared with 2.56% for XLE.
XLE is categorized as Energy Equities, while JEPQ is Nasdaq-100. XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index, while JEPQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLE and 0.35% for JEPQ.
XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLE and JEPQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer