XLE vs. ET
XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index, while ET (Energy Transfer LP) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, XLE returned 10.02%/yr vs 13.08%/yr for ET. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
XLE vs. ET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLE achieves a 31.32% return, which is significantly higher than ET's 21.54% return. Over the past 10 years, XLE has underperformed ET with an annualized return of 10.02%, while ET has yielded a comparatively higher 13.08% annualized return.
XLE
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- 4.72%
- YTD
- 31.32%
- 6M
- 30.37%
- 1Y
- 44.35%
- 3Y*
- 16.51%
- 5Y*
- 20.33%
- 10Y*
- 10.02%
ET
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- 21.54%
- 6M
- 19.30%
- 1Y
- 16.21%
- 3Y*
- 24.40%
- 5Y*
- 21.43%
- 10Y*
- 13.08%
XLE vs. ET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 31.32% | 7.88% | 5.56% | -0.63% | 64.32% | 53.28% | -32.67% | 11.74% | -18.22% | -0.89% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 21.54% | -9.37% | 53.87% | 27.87% | 55.74% | 42.96% | -44.92% | 5.88% | -17.74% | -4.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLE and ET is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2006 | 0.52 |
The correlation between XLE and ET shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (all time) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLE vs. ET — Risk / Return Rank
XLE
ET
XLE vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLE | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.18 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | 1.62 | +2.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.59 | 3.55 | +7.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLE | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.18 | 1.01 | +1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 0.87 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | 0.38 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.36 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
XLE vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLE drawdown since its inception was -71.26%, smaller than the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLE and ET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLE | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.26% | -87.81% | +16.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.05% | -10.02% | -2.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.14% | -24.56% | +4.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.04% | -25.82% | -0.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.81% | -72.82% | +6.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.76% | -5.15% | -1.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.98% | -25.74% | +7.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.20% | 4.57% | -0.37% |
Volatility
XLE vs. ET - Volatility Comparison
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a higher volatility of 7.07% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 5.27%. This indicates that XLE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLE | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.07% | 5.27% | +1.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.58% | 11.84% | +4.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.48% | 16.12% | +4.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.03% | 24.87% | +1.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.58% | 35.02% | -5.44% |
Dividends
XLE vs. ET - Dividend Comparison
XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, less than ET's 6.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ET Energy Transfer LP | 6.90% | 7.97% | 6.51% | 8.95% | 7.33% | 7.41% | 17.27% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.56% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLE and ET have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLE has higher volatility (7.07%) compared to ET (5.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLE dropped -71.26% vs ET's -87.81%.
XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLE and ET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer