PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XIU.TO vs. IGF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XIU.TO vs. IGF

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

XIU.TO (iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF) and IGF (iShares Global Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XIU.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX 60 Index, while IGF is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XIU.TO returned 12.76%/yr vs 9.26%/yr for IGF. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XIU.TO charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGF.

Performance

XIU.TO vs. IGF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XIU.TO is traded in CAD, while IGF is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IGF values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XIU.TO achieves a 9.69% return, which is significantly higher than IGF's 9.03% return. Over the past 10 years, XIU.TO has outperformed IGF with an annualized return of 12.76%, while IGF has yielded a comparatively lower 9.26% annualized return.

XIU.TO

1D
0.26%
1M
2.33%
YTD
9.69%
6M
11.69%
1Y
31.18%
3Y*
22.55%
5Y*
14.33%
10Y*
12.76%

IGF

1D
-0.45%
1M
0.13%
YTD
9.03%
6M
9.09%
1Y
16.21%
3Y*
17.08%
5Y*
12.88%
10Y*
9.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XIU.TO vs. IGF - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XIU.TO
iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF		9.69%28.89%20.73%11.85%-6.35%28.06%5.27%21.81%-7.82%9.58%
IGF
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF		9.03%15.77%24.53%3.62%5.00%11.52%-8.72%20.64%-2.38%11.23%

Correlation

The correlation between XIU.TO and IGF is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2007

0.58

The correlation between XIU.TO and IGF shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.58 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XIU.TO vs. IGF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XIU.TO
IGF

Financial Services

39.4%

-

Energy

18.6%
20.1%

Basic Materials

13.3%

-

Technology

8.8%

-

Industrials

7.9%
38.8%

Consumer Cyclical

4.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.2%

-

Utilities

2.6%
41.1%

Communication Services

2.0%

-

Real Estate

0.2%
0.1%

Healthcare

-

-

Financial Services

XIU.TO
39.4%
IGF

-

Energy

XIU.TO
18.6%
IGF
20.1%

Basic Materials

XIU.TO
13.3%
IGF

-

Technology

XIU.TO
8.8%
IGF

-

Industrials

XIU.TO
7.9%
IGF
38.8%

Consumer Cyclical

XIU.TO
4.1%
IGF

-

Consumer Defensive

XIU.TO
3.2%
IGF

-

Utilities

XIU.TO
2.6%
IGF
41.1%

Communication Services

XIU.TO
2.0%
IGF

-

Real Estate

XIU.TO
0.2%
IGF
0.1%

Healthcare

XIU.TO

-

IGF

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF

iShares Global Infrastructure ETF

Often compared with XIU.TO:
XIU.TO vs. XIC.TOXIU.TO vs. ZCN.TOXIU.TO vs. XDIV.TOXIU.TO vs. XSP.TOXIU.TO vs. HXT.TOXIU.TO vs. SPYXIU.TO vs. XIT.TO
Often compared with IGF:
IGF vs. IFRAIGF vs. GIIIGF vs. NFRAIGF vs. SPYIGF vs. GLIFXIGF vs. VPUIGF vs. XLU

Return for Risk

XIU.TO vs. IGF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XIU.TO
XIU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
XIU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
XIU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
IGF
IGF Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
IGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGF Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
IGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGF Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XIU.TO vs. IGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XIU.TOIGFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.62
1.42

+1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.49
2.06

+1.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.25

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.09

2.98

+1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.93

7.24

+11.69

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XIU.TO vs. IGF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XIU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is higher than the IGF Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XIU.TO and IGF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XIU.TOIGFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

1.42

+1.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.12

0.85

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

0.52

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.33

+0.21

Drawdowns

XIU.TO vs. IGF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XIU.TO drawdown since its inception was -46.98%, roughly equal to the maximum IGF drawdown of -45.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIU.TO and IGF.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XIU.TOIGFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.98%

-45.60%

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.65%

-5.45%

-2.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.36%

-10.66%

-1.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.36%

-13.78%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.46%

-36.84%

+1.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.68%

-4.18%

+2.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.85%

-10.26%

+3.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.65%

2.24%

-0.59%

Volatility

XIU.TO vs. IGF - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) have volatilities of 3.96% and 3.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XIU.TOIGFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.96%

3.85%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.56%

9.24%

+0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.97%

11.49%

+0.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.82%

15.22%

-2.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.02%

17.95%

-2.93%

XIU.TO vs. IGF - Expense Ratio Comparison

XIU.TO has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than IGF's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

XIU.TO vs. IGF - Dividend Comparison

XIU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, less than IGF's 3.01% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGF
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF		3.01%3.23%3.21%3.36%2.67%2.42%2.33%3.27%3.52%2.95%2.98%3.25%
XIU.TO
iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF		2.21%2.39%2.92%3.16%3.02%2.43%3.03%2.87%3.18%2.58%2.65%3.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

XIU.TO and IGF have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XIU.TO is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XIU.TO is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGF.

XIU.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while IGF is Industrials Equities. XIU.TO tracks S&P/TSX 60 Index, while IGF tracks S&P Global Infrastructure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for XIU.TO and 0.39% for IGF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XIU.TO and IGF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer