XHYD vs. XLV
XHYD (BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF) and XLV (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XHYD is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE Diversified US Cash Pay High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclical, while XLV is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Health Care Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XHYD returned 7.51%/yr vs 7.16%/yr for XLV. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XHYD charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLV.
Performance
XHYD vs. XLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XHYD achieves a 0.44% return, which is significantly higher than XLV's -0.98% return.
XHYD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- 0.44%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- 1Y
- 5.22%
- 3Y*
- 7.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLV
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 6.38%
- YTD
- -0.98%
- 6M
- 1.65%
- 1Y
- 15.62%
- 3Y*
- 7.16%
- 5Y*
- 6.05%
- 10Y*
- 9.65%
XHYD vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XHYD BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF | 0.44% | 8.33% | 6.29% | 11.75% | -5.80% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | -0.98% | 14.50% | 2.47% | 2.07% | 7.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between XHYD and XLV is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2022 | 0.42 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XHYD and XLV has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XHYD vs. XLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XHYD
XLV
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Consumer Defensive
XHYD
XLV
-
Utilities
XHYD
XLV
-
Consumer Cyclical
XHYD
XLV
-
Financial Services
XHYD
XLV
-
Industrials
XHYD
XLV
-
Basic Materials
XHYD
XLV
-
Communication Services
XHYD
-
XLV
-
Energy
XHYD
-
XLV
-
Healthcare
XHYD
-
XLV
Real Estate
XHYD
-
XLV
-
Technology
XHYD
-
XLV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XHYD vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank
XHYD
XLV
XHYD vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYD) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XHYD | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.19 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 1.50 | +0.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.53 | 3.60 | +6.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XHYD | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55 | 1.05 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.46 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
XHYD vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XHYD drawdown since its inception was -11.02%, smaller than the maximum XLV drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHYD and XLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XHYD | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.02% | -39.17% | +28.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.49% | -10.47% | +7.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.70% | -17.11% | +13.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.08% | -4.32% | +3.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.04% | -7.12% | +5.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.56% | 4.35% | -3.79% |
Volatility
XHYD vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYD) is 1.83%, while State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) has a volatility of 5.02%. This indicates that XHYD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XHYD | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.83% | 5.02% | -3.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.28% | 10.66% | -7.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.79% | 14.99% | -11.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.15% | 14.76% | -7.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.15% | 16.58% | -9.43% |
XHYD vs. XLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
XHYD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XLV's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
XHYD vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison
XHYD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XHYD BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF | 5.31% | 5.83% | 6.32% | 5.80% | 5.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.64% | 1.60% | 1.67% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 1.49% | 2.17% | 1.57% | 1.47% | 1.60% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XHYD and XLV have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLV has higher volatility (5.02%) compared to XHYD (1.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XHYD dropped -11.02% vs XLV's -39.17%.
On 3-year performance, XHYD leads with 7.51% vs 7.16% for XLV. On fees, XLV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XHYD has been the lower-risk option at 1.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, XHYD has performed better with a 7.51% return vs 7.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XHYD.
XHYD has the higher dividend yield at 5.31%, compared with 1.64% for XLV.
XHYD is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while XLV is Health & Biotech Equities. XHYD tracks ICE Diversified US Cash Pay High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclical, while XLV tracks Health Care Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XHYD and 0.08% for XLV.
XHYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XHYD and XLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer