PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XHYD vs. WM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XHYD vs. WM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYD) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XHYD achieves a 0.44% return, which is significantly higher than WM's -0.81% return.


XHYD

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.75%
YTD
0.44%
6M
0.97%
1Y
5.22%
3Y*
7.51%
5Y*
10Y*

WM

1D
-1.93%
1M
0.79%
YTD
-0.81%
6M
3.67%
1Y
-7.08%
3Y*
11.63%
5Y*
10.86%
10Y*
15.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XHYD vs. WM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XHYD
BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF
0.44%8.33%6.29%11.75%-5.80%
WM
Waste Management, Inc.
-0.81%10.50%14.28%16.20%11.42%

Correlation

The correlation between XHYD and WM is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2022

0.19

The correlation between XHYD and WM shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XHYD vs. WM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XHYD

WM
WM Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
WM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
WM Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
WM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
WM Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XHYD vs. WM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYD) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XHYDWMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

0.95

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

-0.43

+2.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.53

-0.95

+11.48

XHYD vs. WM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XHYD Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is higher than the WM Sharpe Ratio of -0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XHYD and WM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XHYDWMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

-0.38

+1.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.36

+0.31

Drawdowns

XHYD vs. WM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XHYD drawdown since its inception was -11.02%, smaller than the maximum WM drawdown of -77.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHYD and WM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XHYDWMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.02%

-77.85%

+66.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.49%

-16.72%

+14.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.70%

-18.14%

+14.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.08%

-11.59%

+10.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.04%

-17.69%

+15.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.56%

7.49%

-6.93%

Volatility

XHYD vs. WM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYD) is 1.83%, while Waste Management, Inc. (WM) has a volatility of 5.91%. This indicates that XHYD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XHYDWMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.83%

5.91%

-4.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.28%

13.69%

-10.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.79%

18.73%

-14.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.15%

18.55%

-11.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.15%

19.51%

-12.36%

Dividends

XHYD vs. WM - Dividend Comparison

XHYD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
WM
Waste Management, Inc.
1.64%1.50%1.49%1.56%1.66%1.38%1.85%1.80%2.09%1.97%2.31%2.89%
XHYD
BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF
5.31%5.83%6.32%5.80%5.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XHYD and WM have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WM has higher volatility (5.91%) compared to XHYD (1.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XHYD dropped -11.02% vs WM's -77.85%.

XHYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XHYD and WM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer