XHYD vs. SCHX
XHYD (BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF) and SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XHYD is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE Diversified US Cash Pay High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclical, while SCHX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XHYD returned 7.51%/yr vs 21.40%/yr for SCHX. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XHYD charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHX.
Performance
XHYD vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XHYD achieves a 0.44% return, which is significantly lower than SCHX's 8.56% return.
XHYD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- 0.44%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- 1Y
- 5.22%
- 3Y*
- 7.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHX
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- YTD
- 8.56%
- 6M
- 8.52%
- 1Y
- 24.19%
- 3Y*
- 21.40%
- 5Y*
- 12.87%
- 10Y*
- 15.20%
XHYD vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XHYD BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF | 0.44% | 8.33% | 6.29% | 11.75% | -5.80% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 8.56% | 17.46% | 24.88% | 26.84% | -12.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between XHYD and SCHX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2022 | 0.62 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XHYD and SCHX has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XHYD vs. SCHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XHYD
SCHX
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Consumer Defensive
XHYD
SCHX
Utilities
XHYD
SCHX
Consumer Cyclical
XHYD
SCHX
Financial Services
XHYD
SCHX
Industrials
XHYD
SCHX
Basic Materials
XHYD
SCHX
Communication Services
XHYD
-
SCHX
Energy
XHYD
-
SCHX
Healthcare
XHYD
-
SCHX
Real Estate
XHYD
-
SCHX
Technology
XHYD
-
SCHX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XHYD vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank
XHYD
SCHX
XHYD vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYD) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XHYD | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.36 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 2.69 | -0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.53 | 12.15 | -1.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XHYD | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55 | 1.98 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.84 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
XHYD vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XHYD drawdown since its inception was -11.02%, smaller than the maximum SCHX drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHYD and SCHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XHYD | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.02% | -34.33% | +23.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.49% | -9.02% | +6.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.70% | -19.04% | +15.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.08% | -2.64% | +1.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.04% | -3.97% | +1.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.56% | 2.00% | -1.44% |
Volatility
XHYD vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYD) is 1.83%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) has a volatility of 3.84%. This indicates that XHYD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XHYD | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.83% | 3.84% | -2.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.28% | 9.44% | -6.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.79% | 12.27% | -8.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.15% | 17.16% | -10.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.15% | 18.17% | -11.02% |
XHYD vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
XHYD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
XHYD vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison
XHYD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.03% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
XHYD BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF | 5.31% | 5.83% | 6.32% | 5.80% | 5.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XHYD and SCHX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHX has higher volatility (3.84%) compared to XHYD (1.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XHYD dropped -11.02% vs SCHX's -34.33%.
On 3-year performance, SCHX leads with 21.40% vs 7.51% for XHYD. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, XHYD has been the lower-risk option at 1.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 21.40% return vs 7.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XHYD.
XHYD has the higher dividend yield at 5.31%, compared with 1.03% for SCHX.
XHYD is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while SCHX is Large Cap Blend Equities. XHYD tracks ICE Diversified US Cash Pay High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclical, while SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XHYD and 0.03% for SCHX.
SCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XHYD and SCHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer