XHYD vs. SCHC
XHYD (BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF) and SCHC (Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XHYD is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE Diversified US Cash Pay High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclical, while SCHC is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Custom Developed Small Cap ex-US Liquid Net of Tax (Lux). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XHYD returned 7.51%/yr vs 16.78%/yr for SCHC. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XHYD charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for SCHC.
Performance
XHYD vs. SCHC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XHYD achieves a 0.44% return, which is significantly lower than SCHC's 6.81% return.
XHYD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- 0.44%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- 1Y
- 5.22%
- 3Y*
- 7.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHC
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -5.20%
- YTD
- 6.81%
- 6M
- 9.38%
- 1Y
- 23.23%
- 3Y*
- 16.78%
- 5Y*
- 5.72%
- 10Y*
- 7.91%
XHYD vs. SCHC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XHYD BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF | 0.44% | 8.33% | 6.29% | 11.75% | -5.80% |
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF | 6.81% | 37.59% | 1.97% | 14.36% | -16.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between XHYD and SCHC is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2022 | 0.61 |
The correlation between XHYD and SCHC shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XHYD vs. SCHC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XHYD
SCHC
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Consumer Defensive
XHYD
SCHC
Utilities
XHYD
SCHC
Consumer Cyclical
XHYD
SCHC
Financial Services
XHYD
SCHC
Industrials
XHYD
SCHC
Basic Materials
XHYD
SCHC
Communication Services
XHYD
-
SCHC
Energy
XHYD
-
SCHC
Healthcare
XHYD
-
SCHC
Real Estate
XHYD
-
SCHC
Technology
XHYD
-
SCHC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XHYD vs. SCHC — Risk / Return Rank
XHYD
SCHC
XHYD vs. SCHC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYD) and Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XHYD | SCHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.27 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 1.87 | +0.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.53 | 7.03 | +3.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XHYD | SCHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55 | 1.47 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.39 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
XHYD vs. SCHC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XHYD drawdown since its inception was -11.02%, smaller than the maximum SCHC drawdown of -43.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHYD and SCHC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XHYD | SCHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.02% | -43.94% | +32.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.49% | -12.48% | +9.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.70% | -15.52% | +11.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.08% | -5.65% | +4.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.04% | -10.05% | +8.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.56% | 3.31% | -2.75% |
Volatility
XHYD vs. SCHC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYD) is 1.83%, while Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) has a volatility of 5.47%. This indicates that XHYD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XHYD | SCHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.83% | 5.47% | -3.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.28% | 13.49% | -10.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.79% | 15.86% | -12.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.15% | 17.56% | -10.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.15% | 18.02% | -10.87% |
XHYD vs. SCHC - Expense Ratio Comparison
XHYD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHC's 0.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
XHYD vs. SCHC - Dividend Comparison
XHYD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF | 3.43% | 3.66% | 3.72% | 2.94% | 1.78% | 3.02% | 1.62% | 3.23% | 2.51% | 2.73% | 2.01% | 2.34% |
XHYD BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF | 5.31% | 5.83% | 6.32% | 5.80% | 5.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XHYD and SCHC have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHC has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to XHYD (1.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XHYD dropped -11.02% vs SCHC's -43.94%.
On 3-year performance, SCHC leads with 16.78% vs 7.51% for XHYD. On fees, SCHC is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, XHYD has been the lower-risk option at 1.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SCHC has performed better with a 16.78% return vs 7.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHC is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XHYD.
XHYD has the higher dividend yield at 5.31%, compared with 3.43% for SCHC.
XHYD is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while SCHC is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. XHYD tracks ICE Diversified US Cash Pay High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclical, while SCHC tracks FTSE Custom Developed Small Cap ex-US Liquid Net of Tax (Lux). They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XHYD and 0.11% for SCHC.
XHYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XHYD and SCHC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer