XHYD vs. COST

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

XHYD (BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF) is High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE Diversified US Cash Pay High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclical, while COST (Costco Wholesale Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, XHYD returned 7.51%/yr vs 25.18%/yr for COST. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

XHYD vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYD) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XHYD achieves a 0.44% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 13.35% return.

XHYD

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.75%
• YTD: 0.44%
• 6M: 0.97%
• 1Y: 5.22%
• 3Y*: 7.51%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COST

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: -3.37%
• YTD: 13.35%
• 6M: 10.14%
• 1Y: -3.42%
• 3Y*: 25.18%
• 5Y*: 22.05%
• 10Y*: 22.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XHYD vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
XHYD BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF	0.44%	8.33%	6.29%	11.75%	-5.80%
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation	13.35%	-5.39%	39.62%	49.00%	-10.90%

Correlation

The correlation between XHYD and COST is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2022	0.33

The correlation between XHYD and COST shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

XHYD vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COST

COST Risk / Return Rank: 32
COST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
COST Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
COST Omega Ratio Rank: 28
COST Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
COST Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XHYD vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYD) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XHYD	COST	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	-0.18	+1.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.20	-0.13	+2.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	0.98	+0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.36	-0.22	+2.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.53	-0.51	+11.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XHYD vs. COST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XHYD Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is higher than the COST Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XHYD and COST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XHYD	COST	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.55	-0.18	+1.73
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.98	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.02	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	0.59	+0.08

Drawdowns

XHYD vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XHYD drawdown since its inception was -11.02%, smaller than the maximum COST drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHYD and COST.

Drawdown Indicators

	XHYD	COST	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.02%	-53.39%	+42.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.49%	-15.38%	+12.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.70%	-20.74%	+17.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-31.40%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.40%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.08%	-10.93%	+9.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.04%	-13.36%	+11.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.56%	7.15%	-6.59%

Volatility

XHYD vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF (XHYD) is 1.83%, while Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) has a volatility of 7.71%. This indicates that XHYD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XHYD	COST	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.83%	7.71%	-5.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.28%	14.53%	-11.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.79%	18.79%	-15.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.15%	22.71%	-15.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.15%	21.95%	-14.80%

Dividends

XHYD vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

XHYD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation	0.55%	0.59%	0.49%	2.87%	0.76%	0.54%	3.38%	0.86%	1.08%	4.81%	1.09%	4.06%
XHYD BondBloxx US High Yield Consumer Non-Cyclicals Sector ETF	5.31%	5.83%	6.32%	5.80%	5.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XHYD and COST in my portfolio?

XHYD and COST have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XHYD or COST?

COST has higher volatility (7.71%) compared to XHYD (1.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XHYD dropped -11.02% vs COST's -53.39%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XHYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.