PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XEQT.TO vs. OEF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XEQT.TO vs. OEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) and iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XEQT.TO is traded in CAD, while OEF is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the OEF values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEQT.TO achieves a 10.73% return, which is significantly higher than OEF's 9.14% return.


XEQT.TO

1D
0.43%
1M
1.59%
YTD
10.73%
6M
11.16%
1Y
28.07%
3Y*
21.64%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*

OEF

1D
0.74%
1M
1.85%
YTD
9.14%
6M
7.88%
1Y
28.74%
3Y*
25.30%
5Y*
18.50%
10Y*
17.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEQT.TO vs. OEF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XEQT.TO
iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio
10.73%20.57%24.38%17.27%-10.99%18.98%11.85%8.56%
OEF
iShares S&P 100 ETF
9.14%14.33%41.81%29.55%-16.02%29.11%18.33%10.77%

Correlation

The correlation between XEQT.TO and OEF is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2019

0.76

The correlation between XEQT.TO and OEF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XEQT.TO vs. OEF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEQT.TO
XEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
XEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

OEF
OEF Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
OEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
OEF Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
OEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
OEF Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEQT.TO vs. OEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) and iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XEQT.TOOEFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.38

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

2.54

+0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.83

8.95

+5.87

XEQT.TO vs. OEF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the OEF Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEQT.TO and OEF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XEQT.TOOEFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

2.18

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

1.00

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

0.60

+0.35

Drawdowns

XEQT.TO vs. OEF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEQT.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.74%, smaller than the maximum OEF drawdown of -44.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEQT.TO and OEF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XEQT.TOOEFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.74%

-44.36%

+14.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.25%

-11.34%

+3.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.08%

-20.25%

+5.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.55%

-23.64%

+4.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.20%

-2.24%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.10%

-8.46%

+4.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

3.22%

-1.32%

Volatility

XEQT.TO vs. OEF - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) and iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) have volatilities of 4.35% and 4.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XEQT.TOOEFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.35%

4.27%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.75%

10.30%

-0.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.92%

13.28%

-1.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.17%

18.66%

-5.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.56%

19.53%

-3.97%

XEQT.TO vs. OEF - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XEQT.TO and OEF have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XEQT.TO vs. OEF - Dividend Comparison

XEQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than OEF's 0.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OEF
iShares S&P 100 ETF
0.85%0.81%1.03%1.19%1.55%1.06%1.43%1.87%2.09%1.81%2.07%2.11%
XEQT.TO
iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio
1.51%1.66%2.03%2.09%2.14%1.66%1.69%1.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XEQT.TO and OEF have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XEQT.TO and OEF have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

XEQT.TO is categorized as Global Equities, while OEF is Large Cap Blend Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XEQT.TO and OEF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer