PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XEON.DE vs. XYP1.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XEON.DE vs. XYP1.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XEON.DE) and Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond Yield Plus 1-3 UCITS ETF (XYP1.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEON.DE achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly higher than XYP1.DE's -0.03% return. Over the past 10 years, XEON.DE has outperformed XYP1.DE with an annualized return of 0.70%, while XYP1.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 0.56% annualized return.


XEON.DE

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.12%
YTD
0.80%
6M
0.97%
1Y
1.94%
3Y*
2.99%
5Y*
1.94%
10Y*
0.70%

XYP1.DE

1D
0.03%
1M
0.01%
YTD
-0.03%
6M
0.19%
1Y
0.84%
3Y*
2.81%
5Y*
0.84%
10Y*
0.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEON.DE vs. XYP1.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XEON.DE
Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C
0.80%2.25%3.78%3.30%-0.04%-0.58%-0.57%-0.49%-0.47%-0.52%
XYP1.DE
Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond Yield Plus 1-3 UCITS ETF
-0.03%2.36%3.44%3.76%-4.63%-0.71%0.54%1.24%-0.04%-0.30%

Correlation

The correlation between XEON.DE and XYP1.DE is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2013

0.12

The correlation between XEON.DE and XYP1.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.13 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XEON.DE vs. XYP1.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEON.DE
XEON.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
XEON.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEON.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEON.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
XEON.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEON.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

XYP1.DE
XYP1.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
XYP1.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYP1.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYP1.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
XYP1.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYP1.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEON.DE vs. XYP1.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XEON.DE) and Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond Yield Plus 1-3 UCITS ETF (XYP1.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XEON.DEXYP1.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+8.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+20.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

4.27

1.12

+3.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

69.36

0.60

+68.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

316.53

1.87

+314.66

XEON.DE vs. XYP1.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEON.DE Sharpe Ratio is 8.94, which is higher than the XYP1.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEON.DE and XYP1.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XEON.DEXYP1.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.94

0.61

+8.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

7.54

0.47

+7.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.78

0.27

+1.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.45

+0.28

Drawdowns

XEON.DE vs. XYP1.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEON.DE drawdown since its inception was -3.71%, smaller than the maximum XYP1.DE drawdown of -5.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEON.DE and XYP1.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XEON.DEXYP1.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.71%

-5.77%

+2.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.03%

-1.39%

+1.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.08%

-1.39%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.71%

-5.53%

+4.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-3.25%

-5.77%

+2.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-0.68%

+0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.92%

-0.92%

0.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

0.45%

-0.44%

Volatility

XEON.DE vs. XYP1.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XEON.DE) is 0.04%, while Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond Yield Plus 1-3 UCITS ETF (XYP1.DE) has a volatility of 0.48%. This indicates that XEON.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XYP1.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XEON.DEXYP1.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.04%

0.48%

-0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.16%

1.26%

-1.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22%

1.37%

-1.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.25%

1.75%

-1.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.39%

2.01%

-1.62%

XEON.DE vs. XYP1.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XEON.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XYP1.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XEON.DE vs. XYP1.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XEON.DE nor XYP1.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XEON.DE and XYP1.DE have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XEON.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XEON.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for XYP1.DE.

XEON.DE is categorized as Bank Loan, while XYP1.DE is European Government Bonds. XEON.DE tracks Solactive €STR +8.5 Daily Index, while XYP1.DE tracks iBoxx® EUR Sovereigns Eurozone Yield Plus 1-3. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for XEON.DE and 0.15% for XYP1.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XEON.DE and XYP1.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer