XEON.DE vs. PPFB.DE
XEON.DE (Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C) and PPFB.DE (iShares Physical Gold ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - XEON.DE is a Bank Loan fund tracking the Solactive €STR +8.5 Daily Index, while PPFB.DE is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XEON.DE returned 2.99%/yr vs 28.05%/yr for PPFB.DE. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XEON.DE charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for PPFB.DE.
Performance
XEON.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XEON.DE achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly lower than PPFB.DE's 2.74% return.
XEON.DE
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- 1Y
- 1.94%
- 3Y*
- 2.99%
- 5Y*
- 1.94%
- 10Y*
- 0.70%
PPFB.DE
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -3.85%
- YTD
- 2.74%
- 6M
- 6.61%
- 1Y
- 31.41%
- 3Y*
- 28.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XEON.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XEON.DE Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 0.80% | 2.25% | 3.78% | 3.30% | -0.04% | -0.27% |
PPFB.DE iShares Physical Gold ETC | 2.74% | 49.11% | 34.17% | 9.42% | 7.03% | 2.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between XEON.DE and PPFB.DE is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2021 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XEON.DE vs. PPFB.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XEON.DE
PPFB.DE
XEON.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XEON.DE) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XEON.DE | PPFB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +7.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +19.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 4.27 | 1.26 | +3.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 69.36 | 1.81 | +67.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 316.53 | 4.60 | +311.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XEON.DE | PPFB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.94 | 1.30 | +7.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 7.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 1.26 | -0.53 |
Drawdowns
XEON.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XEON.DE drawdown since its inception was -3.71%, smaller than the maximum PPFB.DE drawdown of -16.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEON.DE and PPFB.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XEON.DE | PPFB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.71% | -16.60% | +12.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.03% | -16.60% | +16.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.08% | -16.60% | +16.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -3.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | -15.00% | +14.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.92% | -4.40% | +3.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | 6.55% | -6.54% |
Volatility
XEON.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XEON.DE) is 0.04%, while iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) has a volatility of 5.11%. This indicates that XEON.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PPFB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XEON.DE | PPFB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.04% | 5.11% | -5.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.16% | 20.18% | -20.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22% | 23.12% | -22.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.25% | 16.13% | -15.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.39% | 16.13% | -15.74% |
XEON.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XEON.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than PPFB.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XEON.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XEON.DE nor PPFB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XEON.DE and PPFB.DE have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XEON.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XEON.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for PPFB.DE.
XEON.DE is categorized as Bank Loan, while PPFB.DE is Precious Metals. XEON.DE tracks Solactive €STR +8.5 Daily Index, while PPFB.DE tracks Gold. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for XEON.DE and 0.12% for PPFB.DE.
Find the right allocation for XEON.DE and PPFB.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer