XEON.DE vs. LQDH
XEON.DE (Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C) and LQDH (iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XEON.DE is a Bank Loan fund tracking the Solactive €STR +8.5 Daily Index, while LQDH is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by iShares. XEON.DE is passively managed, while LQDH is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, XEON.DE returned 0.70%/yr vs 4.37%/yr for LQDH. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. XEON.DE charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for LQDH.
Performance
XEON.DE vs. LQDH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XEON.DE is traded in EUR, while LQDH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LQDH values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XEON.DE achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly lower than LQDH's 4.05% return. Over the past 10 years, XEON.DE has underperformed LQDH with an annualized return of 0.70%, while LQDH has yielded a comparatively higher 4.37% annualized return.
XEON.DE
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- 1Y
- 1.94%
- 3Y*
- 2.99%
- 5Y*
- 1.94%
- 10Y*
- 0.70%
LQDH
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 2.78%
- YTD
- 4.05%
- 6M
- 3.56%
- 1Y
- 5.96%
- 3Y*
- 5.58%
- 5Y*
- 6.40%
- 10Y*
- 4.37%
XEON.DE vs. LQDH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XEON.DE Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 0.80% | 2.25% | 3.78% | 3.30% | -0.04% | -0.58% | -0.57% | -0.49% | -0.47% | -0.52% |
LQDH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 4.05% | -5.70% | 14.53% | 7.81% | 4.20% | 9.46% | -6.70% | 11.98% | 2.39% | -7.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between XEON.DE and LQDH is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2014 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XEON.DE vs. LQDH — Risk / Return Rank
XEON.DE
LQDH
XEON.DE vs. LQDH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XEON.DE) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XEON.DE | LQDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +8.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +19.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 4.27 | 1.17 | +3.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 69.36 | 1.74 | +67.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 316.53 | 4.50 | +312.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XEON.DE | LQDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.94 | 0.93 | +8.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 7.54 | 0.80 | +6.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.78 | 0.48 | +1.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.52 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
XEON.DE vs. LQDH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XEON.DE drawdown since its inception was -3.71%, smaller than the maximum LQDH drawdown of -23.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEON.DE and LQDH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XEON.DE | LQDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.71% | -23.50% | +19.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.03% | -3.43% | +3.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.08% | -12.59% | +12.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.71% | -12.59% | +11.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -3.25% | -23.50% | +20.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | -3.40% | +3.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.92% | -4.79% | +3.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | 1.34% | -1.33% |
Volatility
XEON.DE vs. LQDH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XEON.DE) is 0.04%, while iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH) has a volatility of 1.15%. This indicates that XEON.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LQDH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XEON.DE | LQDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.04% | 1.15% | -1.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.16% | 4.34% | -4.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22% | 6.42% | -6.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.25% | 8.07% | -7.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.39% | 9.17% | -8.78% |
XEON.DE vs. LQDH - Expense Ratio Comparison
XEON.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than LQDH's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XEON.DE vs. LQDH - Dividend Comparison
XEON.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LQDH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.96%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LQDH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 5.96% | 6.06% | 7.57% | 7.69% | 3.73% | 1.65% | 2.22% | 3.09% | 5.08% | 2.37% | 2.33% | 2.98% |
XEON.DE Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XEON.DE and LQDH have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XEON.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XEON.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LQDH.
XEON.DE is categorized as Bank Loan, while LQDH is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for XEON.DE and 0.25% for LQDH.
Find the right allocation for XEON.DE and LQDH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer