XEI.TO vs. ZEB.TO

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

XEI.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF) and ZEB.TO (BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XEI.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index, while ZEB.TO is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XEI.TO returned 11.86%/yr vs 16.09%/yr for ZEB.TO. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XEI.TO charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for ZEB.TO.

Performance

XEI.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF (XEI.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XEI.TO having a 22.47% return and ZEB.TO slightly lower at 21.69%. Over the past 10 years, XEI.TO has underperformed ZEB.TO with an annualized return of 11.86%, while ZEB.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 16.09% annualized return.

XEI.TO

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 3.98%
• YTD: 22.47%
• 6M: 18.86%
• 1Y: 38.50%
• 3Y*: 20.67%
• 5Y*: 14.49%
• 10Y*: 11.86%

ZEB.TO

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: 5.70%
• YTD: 21.69%
• 6M: 24.57%
• 1Y: 62.87%
• 3Y*: 33.95%
• 5Y*: 18.84%
• 10Y*: 16.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEI.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XEI.TO iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF	22.47%	20.86%	15.26%	6.59%	0.32%	35.76%	-7.60%	25.30%	-10.95%	7.14%
ZEB.TO BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF	21.69%	43.43%	24.58%	10.87%	-10.38%	39.38%	3.52%	16.06%	-8.85%	14.26%

Correlation

The correlation between XEI.TO and ZEB.TO is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2011	0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between XEI.TO and ZEB.TO has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XEI.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XEI.TO	ZEB.TO
Energy	32.1%	-
Financial Services	31.4%	100.0%
Utilities	11.2%	-
Communication Services	7.6%	-
Consumer Cyclical	6.2%	-
Real Estate	4.8%	-
Basic Materials	4.6%	-
Technology	0.7%	-
Industrials	0.7%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.5%	-
Healthcare	0.2%	-

Return for Risk

XEI.TO vs. ZEB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEI.TO

XEI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 98
XEI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
XEI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
XEI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 98
XEI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
XEI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 97

ZEB.TO

ZEB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 97
ZEB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
ZEB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
ZEB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 97
ZEB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
ZEB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEI.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF (XEI.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XEI.TO	ZEB.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.96	4.97	-0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.80	6.76	+0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.01	1.93	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.17	7.49	+1.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	41.24	32.20	+9.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XEI.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEI.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.96, which is comparable to the ZEB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEI.TO and ZEB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XEI.TO	ZEB.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.96	4.97	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.29	1.40	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74	0.96	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	0.89	-0.24

Drawdowns

XEI.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEI.TO drawdown since its inception was -45.52%, which is greater than ZEB.TO's maximum drawdown of -39.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEI.TO and ZEB.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	XEI.TO	ZEB.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.52%	-39.69%	-5.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.22%	-8.44%	+4.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.96%	-14.80%	+4.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.35%	-25.97%	+8.62%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.52%	-39.69%	-5.83%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.64%	0.00%	-0.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.10%	-5.65%	+0.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.94%	1.96%	-1.02%

Volatility

XEI.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF (XEI.TO) is 2.75%, while BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO) has a volatility of 4.62%. This indicates that XEI.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZEB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XEI.TO	ZEB.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.75%	4.62%	-1.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.72%	11.04%	-4.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.82%	12.74%	-4.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.31%	13.53%	-2.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.03%	16.91%	-0.88%

XEI.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XEI.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than ZEB.TO's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XEI.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Dividend Comparison

XEI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, more than ZEB.TO's 2.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
XEI.TO iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF	3.58%	4.47%	5.45%	4.97%	4.68%	3.58%	5.03%	4.62%	5.42%	4.29%	4.41%	5.64%
ZEB.TO BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF	2.48%	2.95%	3.98%	4.75%	4.29%	3.13%	4.15%	3.65%	3.64%	3.02%	3.19%	3.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XEI.TO and ZEB.TO in my portfolio?

XEI.TO and ZEB.TO have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XEI.TO or ZEB.TO?

On fees, XEI.TO is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XEI.TO or ZEB.TO?

XEI.TO is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for ZEB.TO.

What is the main difference between XEI.TO and ZEB.TO?

XEI.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while ZEB.TO is Financials Equities. XEI.TO tracks S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index, while ZEB.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for XEI.TO and 0.25% for ZEB.TO.