PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XEF.TO vs. XSB.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XEF.TO vs. XSB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF.TO) and iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF (XSB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEF.TO achieves a 8.98% return, which is significantly higher than XSB.TO's 0.80% return. Over the past 10 years, XEF.TO has outperformed XSB.TO with an annualized return of 10.10%, while XSB.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 1.93% annualized return.


XEF.TO

1D
0.52%
1M
0.70%
YTD
8.98%
6M
10.55%
1Y
21.35%
3Y*
17.58%
5Y*
10.64%
10Y*
10.10%

XSB.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.22%
YTD
0.80%
6M
1.10%
1Y
2.95%
3Y*
4.78%
5Y*
1.98%
10Y*
1.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEF.TO vs. XSB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XEF.TO
iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF
8.98%25.69%12.04%15.21%-9.53%10.35%6.13%15.85%-6.66%18.20%
XSB.TO
iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF
0.80%3.70%5.87%4.67%-4.04%-1.11%5.20%3.20%1.60%0.13%

Correlation

The correlation between XEF.TO and XSB.TO is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2013

0.08

Over the past year, XEF.TO and XSB.TO have become more correlated (0.41) than their long-term average of 0.08, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XEF.TO vs. XSB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEF.TO
XEF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
XEF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
XEF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

XSB.TO
XSB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
XSB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
XSB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEF.TO vs. XSB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF.TO) and iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF (XSB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XEF.TOXSB.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.29

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

2.01

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.58

6.68

+0.89

XEF.TO vs. XSB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the XSB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEF.TO and XSB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XEF.TOXSB.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53

1.49

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.73

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.57

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.97

-0.26

Drawdowns

XEF.TO vs. XSB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEF.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.51%, which is greater than XSB.TO's maximum drawdown of -8.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEF.TO and XSB.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XEF.TOXSB.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.51%

-8.65%

-19.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.27%

-1.47%

-9.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.31%

-1.47%

-12.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.58%

-6.99%

-17.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.51%

-8.65%

-19.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.96%

-0.34%

-1.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.61%

-0.79%

-3.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

0.44%

+2.38%

Volatility

XEF.TO vs. XSB.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.30% compared to iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF (XSB.TO) at 0.75%. This indicates that XEF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XEF.TOXSB.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.30%

0.75%

+3.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.82%

1.68%

+10.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.06%

1.99%

+12.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.62%

2.72%

+10.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.87%

3.40%

+11.47%

XEF.TO vs. XSB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XEF.TO has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than XSB.TO's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XEF.TO vs. XSB.TO - Dividend Comparison

XEF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, less than XSB.TO's 3.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XEF.TO
iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF
2.23%2.43%2.76%2.75%2.93%2.42%1.93%2.71%2.75%2.11%2.45%2.42%
XSB.TO
iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF
3.11%3.15%3.05%2.67%2.28%2.05%2.21%2.39%2.39%2.36%2.36%2.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


XEF.TO and XSB.TO have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XSB.TO is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSB.TO is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for XEF.TO.

XEF.TO is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while XSB.TO is Canadian Government Bonds. XEF.TO tracks MSCI EAFE Investable Market Index (CAD), while XSB.TO tracks Morningstar Can 1-5Y Core Bd GR CAD. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for XEF.TO and 0.10% for XSB.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XEF.TO and XSB.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer