XDWI.L vs. WQDS.L

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

XDWI.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C) and WQDS.L (iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - XDWI.L is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while WQDS.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World High Dividend Yield ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDWI.L returned 11.29%/yr vs 11.35%/yr for WQDS.L. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDWI.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for WQDS.L.

Performance

XDWI.L vs. WQDS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWI.L) and iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XDWI.L is traded in USD, while WQDS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the WQDS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDWI.L achieves a 10.03% return, which is significantly lower than WQDS.L's 12.58% return.

XDWI.L

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: -1.57%
• YTD: 10.03%
• 6M: 11.71%
• 1Y: 20.33%
• 3Y*: 20.58%
• 5Y*: 11.29%
• 10Y*: 12.30%

WQDS.L

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 2.66%
• YTD: 12.58%
• 6M: 13.95%
• 1Y: 28.21%
• 3Y*: 18.64%
• 5Y*: 11.35%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDWI.L vs. WQDS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XDWI.L Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C	10.03%	25.51%	13.06%	23.32%	-12.72%	16.09%	11.85%	27.17%	-14.44%	11.04%
WQDS.L iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	12.58%	24.26%	9.82%	16.65%	-7.07%	16.41%	-0.41%	23.53%	-7.89%	-14.49%

Correlation

The correlation between XDWI.L and WQDS.L is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2017	0.75

The correlation between XDWI.L and WQDS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

XDWI.L vs. WQDS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XDWI.L	WQDS.L
Industrials	95.1%	11.1%
Technology	3.5%	35.2%
Utilities	2.8%	3.1%
Communication Services	0.6%	5.4%
Consumer Cyclical	0.3%	4.3%
Financial Services	0.3%	16.9%
Consumer Defensive	0.1%	3.6%
Basic Materials	0.1%	0.7%
Real Estate	0.0%	1.3%
Energy	-	4.1%
Healthcare	-	14.4%

Return for Risk

XDWI.L vs. WQDS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDWI.L

XDWI.L Risk / Return Rank: 42
XDWI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
XDWI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
XDWI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 40
XDWI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
XDWI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 46

WQDS.L

WQDS.L Risk / Return Rank: 89
WQDS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
WQDS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
WQDS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 90
WQDS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
WQDS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDWI.L vs. WQDS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWI.L) and iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XDWI.L	WQDS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.28	2.37	-1.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.01	3.43	-1.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.42	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.79	3.46	-1.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.81	12.85	-6.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XDWI.L vs. WQDS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDWI.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is lower than the WQDS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDWI.L and WQDS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XDWI.L	WQDS.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.28	2.37	-1.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	0.82	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	0.45	+0.19

Drawdowns

XDWI.L vs. WQDS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDWI.L drawdown since its inception was -38.92%, which is greater than WQDS.L's maximum drawdown of -34.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWI.L and WQDS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XDWI.L	WQDS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.92%	-34.72%	-4.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.28%	-8.11%	-3.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.25%	-14.02%	-1.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.26%	-21.68%	-5.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.92%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.29%	-1.48%	-1.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.68%	-7.91%	+2.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.98%	2.19%	+0.79%

Volatility

XDWI.L vs. WQDS.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWI.L) has a higher volatility of 4.56% compared to iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDS.L) at 3.13%. This indicates that XDWI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WQDS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XDWI.L	WQDS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.56%	3.13%	+1.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.32%	9.00%	+4.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.89%	11.89%	+4.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.14%	13.81%	+3.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.73%	16.29%	+1.44%

XDWI.L vs. WQDS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDWI.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than WQDS.L's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

XDWI.L vs. WQDS.L - Dividend Comparison

XDWI.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WQDS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WQDS.L iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	1.82%	2.34%	2.56%	2.86%	2.97%	2.70%	3.03%	3.10%	3.19%	0.79%
XDWI.L Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XDWI.L and WQDS.L in my portfolio?

XDWI.L and WQDS.L have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XDWI.L or WQDS.L?

On fees, XDWI.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XDWI.L or WQDS.L?

XDWI.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for WQDS.L.

What is the main difference between XDWI.L and WQDS.L?

XDWI.L is categorized as Industrials Equities, while WQDS.L is Global Equities. XDWI.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while WQDS.L tracks MSCI World High Dividend Yield ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDWI.L and 0.38% for WQDS.L.