XDWD.DE vs. SWDA.L
XDWD.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C) and SWDA.L (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Global Equities funds - XDWD.DE tracks the MSCI World while SWDA.L tracks the MSCI World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDWD.DE returned 12.76%/yr vs 12.80%/yr for SWDA.L. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XDWD.DE charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SWDA.L.
Performance
XDWD.DE vs. SWDA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XDWD.DE is traded in EUR, while SWDA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SWDA.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XDWD.DE having a 9.74% return and SWDA.L slightly higher at 9.95%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XDWD.DE having a 12.76% annualized return and SWDA.L not far ahead at 12.80%.
XDWD.DE
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 2.58%
- YTD
- 9.74%
- 6M
- 10.29%
- 1Y
- 22.07%
- 3Y*
- 17.17%
- 5Y*
- 12.57%
- 10Y*
- 12.76%
SWDA.L
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 2.74%
- YTD
- 9.95%
- 6M
- 10.06%
- 1Y
- 22.07%
- 3Y*
- 17.18%
- 5Y*
- 12.62%
- 10Y*
- 12.80%
XDWD.DE vs. SWDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDWD.DE Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C | 9.74% | 7.85% | 25.98% | 20.19% | -13.68% | 32.75% | 5.47% | 31.26% | -4.94% | 7.84% |
SWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 9.95% | 6.76% | 26.95% | 20.08% | -13.06% | 31.68% | 6.15% | 30.86% | -4.97% | 7.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDWD.DE and SWDA.L is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2014 | 0.92 |
The correlation between XDWD.DE and SWDA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDWD.DE vs. SWDA.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDWD.DE
SWDA.L
XDWD.DE vs. SWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C (XDWD.DE) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDWD.DE | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.38 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.47 | 3.36 | +0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.96 | 13.73 | +0.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDWD.DE | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 2.01 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 | 0.90 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | 0.85 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.53 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
XDWD.DE vs. SWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDWD.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.55%, smaller than the maximum SWDA.L drawdown of -41.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWD.DE and SWDA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDWD.DE | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.55% | -41.36% | +7.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.34% | -6.53% | +0.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.64% | -20.55% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.64% | -20.55% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.55% | -33.00% | -0.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.38% | -1.27% | -0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.54% | -8.78% | +4.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.58% | 1.60% | -0.02% |
Volatility
XDWD.DE vs. SWDA.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF 1C (XDWD.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.75% compared to iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) at 2.18%. This indicates that XDWD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDWD.DE | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.75% | 2.18% | +0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.70% | 7.61% | +0.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.09% | 10.93% | +0.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.12% | 14.08% | +0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.14% | 15.24% | -0.10% |
XDWD.DE vs. SWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDWD.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than SWDA.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDWD.DE vs. SWDA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDWD.DE nor SWDA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, XDWD.DE and SWDA.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XDWD.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDWD.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SWDA.L.
XDWD.DE tracks MSCI World, while SWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for XDWD.DE and 0.20% for SWDA.L.
Find the right allocation for XDWD.DE and SWDA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer