XDEV.L vs. IEFQ.L
XDEV.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C) and IEFQ.L (iShares Edge MSCIope Quality Factor UCITS) are both exchange-traded funds - XDEV.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Value NR USD, while IEFQ.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDEV.L returned 13.39%/yr vs 9.13%/yr for IEFQ.L. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
XDEV.L vs. IEFQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDEV.L achieves a 32.51% return, which is significantly higher than IEFQ.L's 3.84% return. Over the past 10 years, XDEV.L has outperformed IEFQ.L with an annualized return of 13.39%, while IEFQ.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.13% annualized return.
XDEV.L
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 8.59%
- YTD
- 32.51%
- 6M
- 34.98%
- 1Y
- 64.05%
- 3Y*
- 26.11%
- 5Y*
- 17.16%
- 10Y*
- 13.39%
IEFQ.L
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 1.51%
- YTD
- 3.84%
- 6M
- 5.42%
- 1Y
- 9.37%
- 3Y*
- 8.39%
- 5Y*
- 5.85%
- 10Y*
- 9.13%
XDEV.L vs. IEFQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDEV.L Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C | 32.51% | 30.51% | 6.79% | 13.25% | 1.01% | 21.67% | -6.88% | 14.56% | -9.23% | 11.91% |
IEFQ.L iShares Edge MSCIope Quality Factor UCITS | 3.84% | 14.94% | -0.69% | 12.31% | -6.34% | 18.16% | 6.81% | 24.09% | -5.58% | 14.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDEV.L and IEFQ.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2015 | 0.73 |
The correlation between XDEV.L and IEFQ.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XDEV.L vs. IEFQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XDEV.L
IEFQ.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
XDEV.L
IEFQ.L
Financial Services
XDEV.L
IEFQ.L
Industrials
XDEV.L
IEFQ.L
Healthcare
XDEV.L
IEFQ.L
Consumer Cyclical
XDEV.L
IEFQ.L
Communication Services
XDEV.L
IEFQ.L
Consumer Defensive
XDEV.L
IEFQ.L
Energy
XDEV.L
IEFQ.L
Basic Materials
XDEV.L
IEFQ.L
Utilities
XDEV.L
IEFQ.L
Real Estate
XDEV.L
IEFQ.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDEV.L vs. IEFQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDEV.L
IEFQ.L
XDEV.L vs. IEFQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.L) and iShares Edge MSCIope Quality Factor UCITS (IEFQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDEV.L | IEFQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.90 | 1.15 | +0.75 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.21 | 0.96 | +8.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 35.19 | 3.08 | +32.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDEV.L | IEFQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.74 | 0.82 | +3.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 | 0.37 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.60 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.56 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
XDEV.L vs. IEFQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDEV.L drawdown since its inception was -45.89%, which is greater than IEFQ.L's maximum drawdown of -26.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEV.L and IEFQ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDEV.L | IEFQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.89% | -26.38% | -19.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.92% | -9.67% | +2.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.90% | -11.99% | -7.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.90% | -17.73% | -2.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.20% | -26.38% | -8.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.36% | -3.16% | +0.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.39% | -4.23% | -11.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.81% | 3.03% | -1.22% |
Volatility
XDEV.L vs. IEFQ.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.L) has a higher volatility of 5.80% compared to iShares Edge MSCIope Quality Factor UCITS (IEFQ.L) at 2.84%. This indicates that XDEV.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IEFQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDEV.L | IEFQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.80% | 2.84% | +2.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.04% | 9.39% | +1.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.47% | 11.46% | +2.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.90% | 15.70% | +3.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.96% | 15.31% | +5.65% |
XDEV.L vs. IEFQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XDEV.L and IEFQ.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDEV.L vs. IEFQ.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDEV.L nor IEFQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDEV.L and IEFQ.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDEV.L and IEFQ.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
XDEV.L is categorized as Global Equities, while IEFQ.L is Europe Equities. XDEV.L tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD, while IEFQ.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: DWS and iShares.
Find the right allocation for XDEV.L and IEFQ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer