PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XDEQ.L vs. ICSU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XDEQ.L vs. ICSU.L

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

XDEQ.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C) and ICSU.L (iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - XDEQ.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while ICSU.L is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDEQ.L returned 11.29%/yr vs 8.44%/yr for ICSU.L. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDEQ.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for ICSU.L.

Performance

XDEQ.L vs. ICSU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L) and iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICSU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDEQ.L achieves a 8.07% return, which is significantly lower than ICSU.L's 8.55% return.

XDEQ.L

1D
-0.11%
1M
2.87%
YTD
8.07%
6M
8.54%
1Y
20.96%
3Y*
15.64%
5Y*
11.29%
10Y*
13.42%

ICSU.L

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.51%
YTD
8.55%
6M
8.42%
1Y
6.30%
3Y*
6.78%
5Y*
8.44%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDEQ.L vs. ICSU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDEQ.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C		8.07%7.52%18.91%19.22%-9.44%25.15%10.98%26.01%-2.33%7.66%
ICSU.L
iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		8.55%-3.20%16.26%-5.83%11.78%19.63%5.64%22.78%-4.77%-20.91%

Correlation

The correlation between XDEQ.L and ICSU.L is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2017

0.48

Over the past year, the correlation between XDEQ.L and ICSU.L has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XDEQ.L vs. ICSU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XDEQ.L
ICSU.L

Technology

30.4%

-

Financial Services

14.7%

-

Industrials

10.1%

-

Healthcare

9.2%

-

Communication Services

9.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
99.0%

Energy

4.6%

-

Basic Materials

3.2%

-

Utilities

2.7%

-

Real Estate

1.7%

-

Technology

XDEQ.L
30.4%
ICSU.L

-

Financial Services

XDEQ.L
14.7%
ICSU.L

-

Industrials

XDEQ.L
10.1%
ICSU.L

-

Healthcare

XDEQ.L
9.2%
ICSU.L

-

Communication Services

XDEQ.L
9.1%
ICSU.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

XDEQ.L
8.9%
ICSU.L
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

XDEQ.L
5.3%
ICSU.L
99.0%

Energy

XDEQ.L
4.6%
ICSU.L

-

Basic Materials

XDEQ.L
3.2%
ICSU.L

-

Utilities

XDEQ.L
2.7%
ICSU.L

-

Real Estate

XDEQ.L
1.7%
ICSU.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C

iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

Often compared with XDEQ.L:
XDEQ.L vs. IWQU.LXDEQ.L vs. VWCE.DEXDEQ.L vs. SWDA.LXDEQ.L vs. SPYXDEQ.L vs. XDEV.LXDEQ.L vs. GGRG.LXDEQ.L vs. HSJP.L
Often compared with ICSU.L:
ICSU.L vs. XDWS.LICSU.L vs. PFGCICSU.L vs. IYKICSU.L vs. PEPICSU.L vs. VHVG.LICSU.L vs. PGICSU.L vs. VOO

Return for Risk

XDEQ.L vs. ICSU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XDEQ.L
XDEQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
XDEQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
ICSU.L
ICSU.L Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
ICSU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICSU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICSU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
ICSU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICSU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDEQ.L vs. ICSU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L) and iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICSU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XDEQ.LICSU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.13
0.44

+1.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.00
0.74

+2.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.08

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

0.68

+2.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.54

1.61

+10.93

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XDEQ.L vs. ICSU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDEQ.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the ICSU.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDEQ.L and ICSU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XDEQ.LICSU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

0.44

+1.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.44

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.24

+0.02

Drawdowns

XDEQ.L vs. ICSU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDEQ.L drawdown since its inception was -44.31%, which is greater than ICSU.L's maximum drawdown of -33.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEQ.L and ICSU.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XDEQ.LICSU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.31%

-33.13%

-11.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.90%

-9.24%

+2.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.24%

-20.55%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.24%

-20.55%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.31%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-5.70%

+5.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.46%

-10.36%

-2.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

3.90%

-2.23%

Volatility

XDEQ.L vs. ICSU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L) is 2.33%, while iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICSU.L) has a volatility of 6.88%. This indicates that XDEQ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICSU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XDEQ.LICSU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.33%

6.88%

-4.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.11%

12.08%

-4.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.83%

14.44%

-4.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.16%

19.17%

-0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.54%

18.66%

+1.88%

XDEQ.L vs. ICSU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDEQ.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ICSU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XDEQ.L vs. ICSU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDEQ.L nor ICSU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

XDEQ.L and ICSU.L have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ICSU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ICSU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDEQ.L.

XDEQ.L is categorized as Global Equities, while ICSU.L is Consumer Staples Equities. XDEQ.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while ICSU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDEQ.L and 0.15% for ICSU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDEQ.L and ICSU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer