PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDEQ.L vs. EUHD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDEQ.L vs. EUHD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L) and PowerShares EURO STOXX High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS (EUHD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDEQ.L achieves a 8.07% return, which is significantly lower than EUHD.L's 9.33% return. Over the past 10 years, XDEQ.L has outperformed EUHD.L with an annualized return of 13.42%, while EUHD.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.54% annualized return.


XDEQ.L

1D
-0.11%
1M
2.87%
YTD
8.07%
6M
8.54%
1Y
20.96%
3Y*
15.64%
5Y*
11.29%
10Y*
13.42%

EUHD.L

1D
0.14%
1M
1.44%
YTD
9.33%
6M
11.27%
1Y
25.13%
3Y*
20.45%
5Y*
12.62%
10Y*
9.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDEQ.L vs. EUHD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDEQ.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C
8.07%7.52%18.91%19.22%-9.44%25.15%10.98%26.01%-2.33%12.55%
EUHD.L
PowerShares EURO STOXX High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS
9.33%42.88%5.23%11.38%-3.28%13.30%-13.39%11.53%-7.27%13.76%

Correlation

The correlation between XDEQ.L and EUHD.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2016

0.57

The correlation between XDEQ.L and EUHD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (3 years) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XDEQ.L vs. EUHD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDEQ.L
EUHD.L

Technology

30.4%

-

Financial Services

14.7%
35.2%

Industrials

10.1%
3.8%

Healthcare

9.2%
0.0%

Communication Services

9.1%
6.3%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
3.7%

Energy

4.6%
6.8%

Basic Materials

3.2%
10.0%

Utilities

2.7%
12.1%

Real Estate

1.7%
11.6%

Technology

XDEQ.L
30.4%
EUHD.L

-

Financial Services

XDEQ.L
14.7%
EUHD.L
35.2%

Industrials

XDEQ.L
10.1%
EUHD.L
3.8%

Healthcare

XDEQ.L
9.2%
EUHD.L
0.0%

Communication Services

XDEQ.L
9.1%
EUHD.L
6.3%

Consumer Cyclical

XDEQ.L
8.9%
EUHD.L
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

XDEQ.L
5.3%
EUHD.L
3.7%

Energy

XDEQ.L
4.6%
EUHD.L
6.8%

Basic Materials

XDEQ.L
3.2%
EUHD.L
10.0%

Utilities

XDEQ.L
2.7%
EUHD.L
12.1%

Real Estate

XDEQ.L
1.7%
EUHD.L
11.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDEQ.L vs. EUHD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDEQ.L
XDEQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
XDEQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

EUHD.L
EUHD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
EUHD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUHD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUHD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
EUHD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUHD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDEQ.L vs. EUHD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L) and PowerShares EURO STOXX High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS (EUHD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDEQ.LEUHD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.40

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

3.49

-0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.54

12.12

+0.42

XDEQ.L vs. EUHD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDEQ.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the EUHD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDEQ.L and EUHD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDEQ.LEUHD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

2.24

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.92

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.62

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.62

-0.35

Drawdowns

XDEQ.L vs. EUHD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDEQ.L drawdown since its inception was -44.31%, which is greater than EUHD.L's maximum drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEQ.L and EUHD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDEQ.LEUHD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.31%

-35.97%

-8.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.90%

-7.17%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.24%

-10.52%

-9.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.24%

-19.84%

-0.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.31%

-35.97%

+11.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-2.06%

+1.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.46%

-5.37%

-7.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

2.07%

-0.40%

Volatility

XDEQ.L vs. EUHD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L) is 2.33%, while PowerShares EURO STOXX High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS (EUHD.L) has a volatility of 3.14%. This indicates that XDEQ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EUHD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDEQ.LEUHD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.33%

3.14%

-0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.11%

8.61%

-1.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.83%

11.18%

-1.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.16%

13.73%

+5.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.54%

15.50%

+5.04%

XDEQ.L vs. EUHD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDEQ.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EUHD.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDEQ.L vs. EUHD.L - Dividend Comparison

XDEQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EUHD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EUHD.L
PowerShares EURO STOXX High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS
3.95%4.61%5.86%5.50%5.43%4.28%3.06%4.66%4.33%3.41%3.51%
XDEQ.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDEQ.L and EUHD.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDEQ.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDEQ.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EUHD.L.

XDEQ.L is categorized as Global Equities, while EUHD.L is Europe Equities. XDEQ.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while EUHD.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDEQ.L and 0.30% for EUHD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDEQ.L and EUHD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer