PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDEM.L vs. IEFQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDEM.L vs. IEFQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.L) and iShares Edge MSCIope Quality Factor UCITS (IEFQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDEM.L achieves a 20.43% return, which is significantly higher than IEFQ.L's 3.84% return. Over the past 10 years, XDEM.L has outperformed IEFQ.L with an annualized return of 16.65%, while IEFQ.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.13% annualized return.


XDEM.L

1D
0.58%
1M
5.51%
YTD
20.43%
6M
19.66%
1Y
32.95%
3Y*
26.16%
5Y*
14.45%
10Y*
16.65%

IEFQ.L

1D
0.27%
1M
1.51%
YTD
3.84%
6M
5.42%
1Y
9.37%
3Y*
8.39%
5Y*
5.85%
10Y*
9.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDEM.L vs. IEFQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDEM.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C
20.43%12.52%32.87%5.88%-8.06%15.61%24.14%23.37%2.28%20.40%
IEFQ.L
iShares Edge MSCIope Quality Factor UCITS
3.84%14.94%-0.69%12.31%-6.34%18.16%6.81%24.09%-5.58%14.65%

Correlation

The correlation between XDEM.L and IEFQ.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2015

0.69

The correlation between XDEM.L and IEFQ.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XDEM.L vs. IEFQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDEM.L
IEFQ.L

Technology

34.6%
10.8%

Industrials

20.5%
19.5%

Financial Services

18.9%
21.1%

Communication Services

7.2%
3.0%

Healthcare

6.0%
14.2%

Basic Materials

4.9%
5.6%

Utilities

2.6%
5.1%

Energy

1.8%
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

1.2%
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

1.2%
6.6%

Real Estate

1.0%
0.8%

Technology

XDEM.L
34.6%
IEFQ.L
10.8%

Industrials

XDEM.L
20.5%
IEFQ.L
19.5%

Financial Services

XDEM.L
18.9%
IEFQ.L
21.1%

Communication Services

XDEM.L
7.2%
IEFQ.L
3.0%

Healthcare

XDEM.L
6.0%
IEFQ.L
14.2%

Basic Materials

XDEM.L
4.9%
IEFQ.L
5.6%

Utilities

XDEM.L
2.6%
IEFQ.L
5.1%

Energy

XDEM.L
1.8%
IEFQ.L
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

XDEM.L
1.2%
IEFQ.L
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

XDEM.L
1.2%
IEFQ.L
6.6%

Real Estate

XDEM.L
1.0%
IEFQ.L
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDEM.L vs. IEFQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDEM.L
XDEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
XDEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

IEFQ.L
IEFQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
IEFQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEFQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEFQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
IEFQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEFQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDEM.L vs. IEFQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.L) and iShares Edge MSCIope Quality Factor UCITS (IEFQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDEM.LIEFQ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.15

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

0.96

+2.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.15

3.08

+11.06

XDEM.L vs. IEFQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDEM.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the IEFQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDEM.L and IEFQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDEM.LIEFQ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

0.82

+1.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.37

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.60

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.56

-0.23

Drawdowns

XDEM.L vs. IEFQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDEM.L drawdown since its inception was -44.39%, which is greater than IEFQ.L's maximum drawdown of -26.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEM.L and IEFQ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDEM.LIEFQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.39%

-26.38%

-18.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.01%

-9.67%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.17%

-11.99%

-9.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.17%

-17.73%

-3.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.38%

-26.38%

+3.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.24%

-3.16%

+0.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.48%

-4.23%

-8.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

3.03%

-0.71%

Volatility

XDEM.L vs. IEFQ.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.L) has a higher volatility of 6.04% compared to iShares Edge MSCIope Quality Factor UCITS (IEFQ.L) at 2.84%. This indicates that XDEM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IEFQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDEM.LIEFQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.04%

2.84%

+3.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.94%

9.39%

+4.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.37%

11.46%

+4.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.50%

15.70%

+5.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.31%

15.31%

+7.00%

XDEM.L vs. IEFQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XDEM.L and IEFQ.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDEM.L vs. IEFQ.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDEM.L nor IEFQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDEM.L and IEFQ.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDEM.L and IEFQ.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

XDEM.L is categorized as Momentum, while IEFQ.L is Europe Equities. XDEM.L tracks MSCI World Momentum Index, while IEFQ.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: DWS and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDEM.L and IEFQ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer