PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDEM.L vs. EUHD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDEM.L vs. EUHD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.L) and PowerShares EURO STOXX High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS (EUHD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDEM.L achieves a 20.43% return, which is significantly higher than EUHD.L's 9.33% return. Over the past 10 years, XDEM.L has outperformed EUHD.L with an annualized return of 16.65%, while EUHD.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.54% annualized return.


XDEM.L

1D
0.58%
1M
5.51%
YTD
20.43%
6M
19.66%
1Y
32.95%
3Y*
26.16%
5Y*
14.45%
10Y*
16.65%

EUHD.L

1D
0.14%
1M
1.44%
YTD
9.33%
6M
11.27%
1Y
25.13%
3Y*
20.45%
5Y*
12.62%
10Y*
9.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDEM.L vs. EUHD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDEM.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C
20.43%12.52%32.87%5.88%-8.06%15.61%24.14%23.37%2.28%20.40%
EUHD.L
PowerShares EURO STOXX High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS
9.33%42.88%5.23%11.38%-3.28%13.30%-13.39%11.53%-7.27%13.76%

Correlation

The correlation between XDEM.L and EUHD.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2016

0.49

The correlation between XDEM.L and EUHD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (3 years) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XDEM.L vs. EUHD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDEM.L
EUHD.L

Technology

34.6%

-

Industrials

20.5%
3.8%

Financial Services

18.9%
35.2%

Communication Services

7.2%
6.3%

Healthcare

6.0%
0.0%

Basic Materials

4.9%
10.0%

Utilities

2.6%
12.1%

Energy

1.8%
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

1.2%
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

1.2%
10.4%

Real Estate

1.0%
11.6%

Technology

XDEM.L
34.6%
EUHD.L

-

Industrials

XDEM.L
20.5%
EUHD.L
3.8%

Financial Services

XDEM.L
18.9%
EUHD.L
35.2%

Communication Services

XDEM.L
7.2%
EUHD.L
6.3%

Healthcare

XDEM.L
6.0%
EUHD.L
0.0%

Basic Materials

XDEM.L
4.9%
EUHD.L
10.0%

Utilities

XDEM.L
2.6%
EUHD.L
12.1%

Energy

XDEM.L
1.8%
EUHD.L
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

XDEM.L
1.2%
EUHD.L
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

XDEM.L
1.2%
EUHD.L
10.4%

Real Estate

XDEM.L
1.0%
EUHD.L
11.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDEM.L vs. EUHD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDEM.L
XDEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
XDEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

EUHD.L
EUHD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
EUHD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUHD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUHD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
EUHD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUHD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDEM.L vs. EUHD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.L) and PowerShares EURO STOXX High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS (EUHD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDEM.LEUHD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.40

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

3.49

+0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.15

12.12

+2.03

XDEM.L vs. EUHD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDEM.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the EUHD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDEM.L and EUHD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDEM.LEUHD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

2.24

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.92

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.62

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.62

-0.28

Drawdowns

XDEM.L vs. EUHD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDEM.L drawdown since its inception was -44.39%, which is greater than EUHD.L's maximum drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEM.L and EUHD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDEM.LEUHD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.39%

-35.97%

-8.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.01%

-7.17%

-1.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.17%

-10.52%

-10.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.17%

-19.84%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.38%

-35.97%

+12.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.24%

-2.06%

-0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.48%

-5.37%

-7.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

2.07%

+0.25%

Volatility

XDEM.L vs. EUHD.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.L) has a higher volatility of 6.04% compared to PowerShares EURO STOXX High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS (EUHD.L) at 3.14%. This indicates that XDEM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUHD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDEM.LEUHD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.04%

3.14%

+2.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.94%

8.61%

+5.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.37%

11.18%

+5.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.50%

13.73%

+7.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.31%

15.50%

+6.81%

XDEM.L vs. EUHD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDEM.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EUHD.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDEM.L vs. EUHD.L - Dividend Comparison

XDEM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EUHD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EUHD.L
PowerShares EURO STOXX High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS
3.95%4.61%5.86%5.50%5.43%4.28%3.06%4.66%4.33%3.41%3.51%
XDEM.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDEM.L and EUHD.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDEM.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDEM.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EUHD.L.

XDEM.L is categorized as Momentum, while EUHD.L is Europe Equities. XDEM.L tracks MSCI World Momentum Index, while EUHD.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: DWS and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDEM.L and 0.30% for EUHD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDEM.L and EUHD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer