PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XBB.TO vs. T.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XBB.TO vs. T.TO

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

XBB.TO (iShares Core Canadian Universe Bond Index ETF) is Intermediate Core Bond fund tracking the FTSE Canada Universe Bond Index, while T.TO (TELUS Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, XBB.TO returned 1.55%/yr vs 12.82%/yr for T.TO. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

XBB.TO vs. T.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core Canadian Universe Bond Index ETF (XBB.TO) and TELUS Corporation (T.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XBB.TO achieves a 0.89% return, which is significantly higher than T.TO's -3.87% return. Over the past 10 years, XBB.TO has underperformed T.TO with an annualized return of 1.55%, while T.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.82% annualized return.

XBB.TO

1D
-0.39%
1M
0.01%
YTD
0.89%
6M
1.29%
1Y
2.87%
3Y*
4.23%
5Y*
0.54%
10Y*
1.55%

T.TO

1D
-1.05%
1M
-2.63%
YTD
-3.87%
6M
-4.00%
1Y
-17.45%
3Y*
-6.39%
5Y*
-3.68%
10Y*
12.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBB.TO vs. T.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XBB.TO
iShares Core Canadian Universe Bond Index ETF		0.89%2.59%4.00%6.64%-11.66%-2.81%8.58%7.28%1.00%2.42%
T.TO
TELUS Corporation		-3.87%0.34%-11.50%-4.41%-8.27%23.58%113.11%21.76%3.92%21.55%

Correlation

The correlation between XBB.TO and T.TO is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2006

0.01

The correlation between XBB.TO and T.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (all time) to 0.25 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core Canadian Universe Bond Index ETF

TELUS Corporation

Often compared with XBB.TO:
XBB.TO vs. VAB.TOXBB.TO vs. ZAG.TOXBB.TO vs. XCB.TOXBB.TO vs. XSB.TOXBB.TO vs. XLB.TOXBB.TO vs. XGB.TOXBB.TO vs. XSH.TO
Often compared with T.TO:
T.TO vs. BCE.TOT.TO vs. TUT.TO vs. FTS.TOT.TO vs. RCI-B.TOT.TO vs. BTO.TOT.TO vs. BCET.TO vs. VDY.TO

Return for Risk

XBB.TO vs. T.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XBB.TO
XBB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
XBB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
XBB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
T.TO
T.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
T.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
T.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
T.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
T.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBB.TO vs. T.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Canadian Universe Bond Index ETF (XBB.TO) and TELUS Corporation (T.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XBB.TOT.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.66
-1.04

+1.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.92
-1.29

+2.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

0.82

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.06

-0.71

+1.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.47

-1.27

+3.74

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XBB.TO vs. T.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XBB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is higher than the T.TO Sharpe Ratio of -1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XBB.TO and T.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XBB.TOT.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

-1.04

+1.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

-0.23

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

0.38

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.61

0.00

Drawdowns

XBB.TO vs. T.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBB.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.16%, smaller than the maximum T.TO drawdown of -39.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBB.TO and T.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XBB.TOT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.16%

-39.72%

+21.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.73%

-24.59%

+21.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.42%

-24.59%

+19.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.90%

-38.60%

+22.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.16%

-38.60%

+20.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.98%

-35.84%

+33.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.07%

-10.12%

+7.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.16%

13.81%

-12.65%

Volatility

XBB.TO vs. T.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core Canadian Universe Bond Index ETF (XBB.TO) is 1.54%, while TELUS Corporation (T.TO) has a volatility of 3.97%. This indicates that XBB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than T.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XBB.TOT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.54%

3.97%

-2.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.42%

13.40%

-9.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.37%

16.82%

-12.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.63%

16.45%

-9.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.70%

33.58%

-26.88%

Dividends

XBB.TO vs. T.TO - Dividend Comparison

XBB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, less than T.TO's 9.82% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
T.TO
TELUS Corporation		9.82%9.14%7.99%6.17%5.19%4.27%4.70%8.96%9.28%8.27%8.61%8.78%
XBB.TO
iShares Core Canadian Universe Bond Index ETF		3.43%3.39%3.25%3.01%2.91%2.54%2.55%2.80%2.92%2.83%2.81%2.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

XBB.TO and T.TO have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XBB.TO and T.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer