PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XAR vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XAR vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAR achieves a 12.43% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 16.71% return. Over the past 10 years, XAR has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 17.82%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.59% annualized return.


XAR

1D
-0.54%
1M
2.15%
YTD
12.43%
6M
16.39%
1Y
37.23%
3Y*
32.47%
5Y*
15.97%
10Y*
17.82%

QQQ

1D
1.56%
1M
0.68%
YTD
16.71%
6M
15.00%
1Y
35.78%
3Y*
27.15%
5Y*
16.98%
10Y*
21.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XAR vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XAR
SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF
12.43%46.15%23.32%23.79%-5.02%2.31%6.18%39.33%-4.58%33.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
16.71%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between XAR and QQQ is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2011

0.56

The correlation between XAR and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

XAR vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XAR
QQQ

Industrials

99.1%
2.8%

Technology

0.8%
53.8%

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Communication Services

-

15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Energy

-

0.6%

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Industrials

XAR
99.1%
QQQ
2.8%

Technology

XAR
0.8%
QQQ
53.8%

Basic Materials

XAR

-

QQQ
1.1%

Communication Services

XAR

-

QQQ
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

XAR

-

QQQ
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

XAR

-

QQQ
7.7%

Energy

XAR

-

QQQ
0.6%

Financial Services

XAR

-

QQQ
0.2%

Healthcare

XAR

-

QQQ
4.2%

Real Estate

XAR

-

QQQ
0.1%

Utilities

XAR

-

QQQ
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XAR vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XAR
XAR Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
XAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAR Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
XAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAR Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XAR vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XARQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.38

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

3.00

-0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.13

11.43

-5.30

XAR vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAR Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAR and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XARQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

2.15

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.76

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.97

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.40

+0.44

Drawdowns

XAR vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAR drawdown since its inception was -46.37%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAR and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XARQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.37%

-82.97%

+36.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.22%

-11.96%

-5.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.73%

-22.77%

+3.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.40%

-35.12%

+2.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.37%

-35.12%

-11.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.35%

-4.03%

-3.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.78%

-32.77%

+25.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.09%

3.14%

+2.95%

Volatility

XAR vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) has a higher volatility of 9.09% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 6.84%. This indicates that XAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XARQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.09%

6.84%

+2.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.58%

13.20%

+9.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.05%

16.74%

+10.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.46%

22.49%

+0.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.65%

22.36%

+2.29%

XAR vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XAR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

XAR vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

XAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than QQQ's 0.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.39%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
XAR
SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF
0.32%0.40%0.66%0.54%0.50%0.83%0.63%0.75%1.19%0.76%1.09%2.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


XAR and QQQ have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XAR has higher volatility (9.09%) compared to QQQ (6.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XAR dropped -46.37% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 21.59% vs 17.82% for XAR. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 6.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 21.59% return vs 17.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XAR.

QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.39%, compared with 0.32% for XAR.

XAR is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. XAR tracks S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XAR and 0.18% for QQQ.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XAR and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer