WULF vs. LTBR
WULF (TeraWulf Inc.) and LTBR (Lightbridge Corporation) are both stocks. WULF operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services), while LTBR operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, WULF returned 10.67%/yr vs -9.07%/yr for LTBR. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WULF vs. LTBR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WULF achieves a 125.07% return, which is significantly higher than LTBR's -24.84% return. Over the past 10 years, WULF has outperformed LTBR with an annualized return of 10.67%, while LTBR has yielded a comparatively lower -9.07% annualized return.
WULF
- 1D
- 7.75%
- 1M
- 10.56%
- YTD
- 125.07%
- 6M
- 72.86%
- 1Y
- 494.48%
- 3Y*
- 168.90%
- 5Y*
- 22.83%
- 10Y*
- 10.67%
LTBR
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- -29.26%
- YTD
- -24.84%
- 6M
- -43.92%
- 1Y
- -39.68%
- 3Y*
- 25.47%
- 5Y*
- 7.20%
- 10Y*
- -9.07%
WULF vs. LTBR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WULF TeraWulf Inc. | 125.07% | 103.00% | 135.83% | 260.58% | -95.58% | 77.08% | 86.34% | -36.55% | 12.13% | -33.16% |
LTBR Lightbridge Corporation | -24.84% | 167.23% | 47.35% | -17.48% | -41.28% | 56.62% | -6.00% | -31.19% | -55.33% | 7.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between WULF and LTBR is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2000 | 0.11 |
Over the past year, WULF and LTBR have become more correlated (0.45) than their long-term average of 0.11, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
WULF:
$10.94B
LTBR:
$304.42M
WULF:
-$2.55
LTBR:
-$0.84
WULF:
$168.06M
LTBR:
$0.00
WULF:
$107.59M
LTBR:
$0.00
WULF:
-$132.10M
LTBR:
-$11.77M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WULF vs. LTBR — Risk / Return Rank
WULF
LTBR
WULF vs. LTBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) and Lightbridge Corporation (LTBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WULF | LTBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +5.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.00 | +0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 15.71 | -0.60 | +16.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 41.48 | -1.00 | +42.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WULF | LTBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.72 | -0.40 | +5.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.07 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 | -0.09 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | -0.13 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
WULF vs. LTBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WULF drawdown since its inception was -98.50%, roughly equal to the maximum LTBR drawdown of -99.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WULF and LTBR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WULF | LTBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.50% | -99.96% | +1.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.74% | -66.04% | +34.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -75.77% | -66.04% | -9.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.50% | -83.72% | -14.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -98.50% | -95.69% | -2.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.31% | -99.77% | +71.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.67% | -95.02% | +48.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.00% | 39.74% | -27.74% |
Volatility
WULF vs. LTBR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) is 21.75%, while Lightbridge Corporation (LTBR) has a volatility of 26.37%. This indicates that WULF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LTBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WULF | LTBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.75% | 26.37% | -4.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 64.60% | 60.74% | +3.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 105.83% | 100.20% | +5.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 127.48% | 109.14% | +18.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 101.40% | 106.15% | -4.75% |
Dividends
WULF vs. LTBR - Dividend Comparison
Neither WULF nor LTBR has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTBR Lightbridge Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WULF TeraWulf Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 33.22% |
Financials
WULF vs. LTBR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TeraWulf Inc. and Lightbridge Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
WULF and LTBR have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LTBR has higher volatility (26.37%) compared to WULF (21.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WULF dropped -98.50% vs LTBR's -99.96%.
WULF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.72 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WULF and LTBR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer