WTS vs. NFG
WTS (Watts Water Technologies, Inc.) and NFG (National Fuel Gas Company) are both stocks. WTS operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while NFG operates in Oil & Gas Integrated (Energy). Over the past 10 years, WTS returned 19.63%/yr vs 6.57%/yr for NFG. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WTS vs. NFG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WTS achieves a 14.71% return, which is significantly higher than NFG's -4.09% return. Over the past 10 years, WTS has outperformed NFG with an annualized return of 19.63%, while NFG has yielded a comparatively lower 6.57% annualized return.
WTS
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 6.48%
- YTD
- 14.71%
- 6M
- 16.79%
- 1Y
- 29.91%
- 3Y*
- 22.89%
- 5Y*
- 18.24%
- 10Y*
- 19.63%
NFG
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- -3.99%
- YTD
- -4.09%
- 6M
- -5.13%
- 1Y
- -5.21%
- 3Y*
- 16.94%
- 5Y*
- 10.37%
- 10Y*
- 6.57%
WTS vs. NFG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WTS Watts Water Technologies, Inc. | 14.71% | 36.85% | -1.62% | 43.57% | -24.08% | 60.63% | 23.14% | 56.20% | -14.13% | 17.84% |
NFG National Fuel Gas Company | -4.09% | 35.31% | 25.38% | -17.71% | 1.87% | 60.66% | -7.58% | -5.94% | -3.74% | -0.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between WTS and NFG is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 1987 | 0.28 |
Over the past year, the correlation between WTS and NFG has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.28, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
WTS:
$10.57B
NFG:
$7.16B
WTS:
$10.95
NFG:
$7.46
WTS:
28.82
NFG:
10.23
WTS:
1.35
NFG:
0.08
WTS:
4.13
NFG:
7.11
WTS:
5.04
NFG:
1.87
WTS:
$2.56B
NFG:
$988.24M
WTS:
$1.26B
NFG:
$576.67M
WTS:
$556.30M
NFG:
$1.41B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WTS vs. NFG — Risk / Return Rank
WTS
NFG
WTS vs. NFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Watts Water Technologies, Inc. (WTS) and National Fuel Gas Company (NFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WTS | NFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 0.97 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | -0.26 | +2.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.04 | -0.56 | +5.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WTS | NFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | -0.26 | +1.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.47 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.27 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.39 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
WTS vs. NFG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WTS drawdown since its inception was -63.68%, which is greater than NFG's maximum drawdown of -55.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTS and NFG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WTS | NFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.68% | -55.49% | -8.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.45% | -20.45% | +5.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.54% | -20.45% | +0.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.08% | -35.74% | -8.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.08% | -44.28% | +0.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.81% | -20.45% | +14.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.20% | -14.30% | -1.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.95% | 9.35% | -3.40% |
Volatility
WTS vs. NFG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Watts Water Technologies, Inc. (WTS) is 5.17%, while National Fuel Gas Company (NFG) has a volatility of 5.75%. This indicates that WTS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WTS | NFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.17% | 5.75% | -0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.23% | 14.13% | +2.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.52% | 19.83% | +2.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.76% | 22.24% | +5.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.22% | 24.05% | +4.17% |
Dividends
WTS vs. NFG - Dividend Comparison
WTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than NFG's 2.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFG National Fuel Gas Company | 2.80% | 2.65% | 3.36% | 3.91% | 2.97% | 2.83% | 4.30% | 3.72% | 3.30% | 3.00% | 2.84% | 3.67% |
WTS Watts Water Technologies, Inc. | 0.69% | 0.72% | 0.81% | 0.66% | 0.79% | 0.52% | 0.76% | 0.90% | 1.27% | 0.99% | 1.09% | 1.33% |
Financials
WTS vs. NFG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and National Fuel Gas Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WTS vs. NFG - Profitability Comparison
WTS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Watts Water Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 326.10M and revenue of 677.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.2%.
NFG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National Fuel Gas Company reported a gross profit of -300.89M and revenue of -651.51M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.2%.
WTS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Watts Water Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 133.00M and revenue of 677.30M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.6%.
NFG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National Fuel Gas Company reported an operating income of 347.14M and revenue of -651.51M, resulting in an operating margin of -53.3%.
WTS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Watts Water Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 99.60M and revenue of 677.30M, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.
NFG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National Fuel Gas Company reported a net income of 247.67M and revenue of -651.51M, resulting in a net margin of -38.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WTS and NFG have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NFG has higher volatility (5.75%) compared to WTS (5.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTS dropped -63.68% vs NFG's -55.49%.
WTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WTS and NFG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer