WTS vs. DRS
WTS (Watts Water Technologies, Inc.) and DRS (Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — WTS in Specialty Industrial Machinery, DRS in Aerospace & Defense. Over the past 3 years, WTS returned 22.89%/yr vs 42.71%/yr for DRS. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WTS vs. DRS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WTS achieves a 14.71% return, which is significantly lower than DRS's 37.10% return.
WTS
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 6.48%
- YTD
- 14.71%
- 6M
- 16.79%
- 1Y
- 29.91%
- 3Y*
- 22.89%
- 5Y*
- 18.24%
- 10Y*
- 19.63%
DRS
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 12.79%
- YTD
- 37.10%
- 6M
- 37.79%
- 1Y
- 5.81%
- 3Y*
- 42.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WTS vs. DRS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WTS Watts Water Technologies, Inc. | 14.71% | 36.85% | -1.62% | 43.57% | -3.66% |
DRS Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock | 37.10% | 6.56% | 61.23% | 56.81% | 10.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between WTS and DRS is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2022 | 0.36 |
The correlation between WTS and DRS shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.37 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
WTS:
$10.95
DRS:
$1.44
WTS:
28.82
DRS:
32.36
WTS:
1.35
DRS:
1.92
WTS:
4.13
DRS:
2.54
WTS:
$2.56B
DRS:
$3.70B
WTS:
$1.26B
DRS:
$894.00M
WTS:
$556.30M
DRS:
$433.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WTS vs. DRS — Risk / Return Rank
WTS
DRS
WTS vs. DRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Watts Water Technologies, Inc. (WTS) and Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock (DRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WTS | DRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.06 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | 0.18 | +1.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.04 | 0.36 | +4.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WTS | DRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | 0.15 | +1.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 1.34 | -1.00 |
Drawdowns
WTS vs. DRS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WTS drawdown since its inception was -63.68%, which is greater than DRS's maximum drawdown of -32.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTS and DRS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WTS | DRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.68% | -32.48% | -31.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.45% | -32.48% | +17.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.54% | -32.48% | +12.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.08% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.81% | -4.53% | -1.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.20% | -7.23% | -8.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.95% | 16.05% | -10.10% |
Volatility
WTS vs. DRS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Watts Water Technologies, Inc. (WTS) is 5.17%, while Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock (DRS) has a volatility of 11.11%. This indicates that WTS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WTS | DRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.17% | 11.11% | -5.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.23% | 30.76% | -14.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.52% | 39.89% | -17.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.76% | 38.47% | -10.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.22% | 38.47% | -10.25% |
Dividends
WTS vs. DRS - Dividend Comparison
WTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than DRS's 0.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRS Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock | 0.77% | 1.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WTS Watts Water Technologies, Inc. | 0.69% | 0.72% | 0.81% | 0.66% | 0.79% | 0.52% | 0.76% | 0.90% | 1.27% | 0.99% | 1.09% | 1.33% |
Financials
WTS vs. DRS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Watts Water Technologies, Inc. and Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WTS vs. DRS - Profitability Comparison
WTS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Watts Water Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 326.10M and revenue of 677.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.2%.
DRS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock reported a gross profit of 212.00M and revenue of 846.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.1%.
WTS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Watts Water Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 133.00M and revenue of 677.30M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.6%.
DRS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock reported an operating income of 77.00M and revenue of 846.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.1%.
WTS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Watts Water Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 99.60M and revenue of 677.30M, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.
DRS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock reported a net income of 62.00M and revenue of 846.00M, resulting in a net margin of 7.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WTS and DRS have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DRS has higher volatility (11.11%) compared to WTS (5.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTS dropped -63.68% vs DRS's -32.48%.
WTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WTS and DRS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer