PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WS vs. COST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WS vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Worthington Steel Inc (WS) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WS achieves a 20.67% return, which is significantly higher than COST's 13.35% return.


WS

1D
0.12%
1M
2.82%
YTD
20.67%
6M
19.03%
1Y
63.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

COST

1D
0.30%
1M
-3.37%
YTD
13.35%
6M
10.14%
1Y
-3.42%
3Y*
25.18%
5Y*
22.05%
10Y*
22.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WS vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
WS
Worthington Steel Inc
20.67%11.18%15.44%26.58%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
13.35%-5.39%39.62%13.22%

Correlation

The correlation between WS and COST is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2023

0.08

The correlation between WS and COST shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

WS:

$2.44

COST:

$26.51

PE Ratio

WS:

17.05

COST:

36.77

PEG Ratio

WS:

16.56

COST:

2.88

PS Ratio

WS:

0.62

COST:

1.11

Total Revenue (TTM)

WS:

$3.35B

COST:

$293.59B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WS:

$411.50M

COST:

$11.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

WS:

$216.90M

COST:

$12.48B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WS vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WS
WS Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
WS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
WS Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
WS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
WS Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

COST
COST Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
COST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COST Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
COST Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
COST Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
COST Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WS vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Worthington Steel Inc (WS) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WSCOSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

0.98

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

-0.22

+1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.42

-0.51

+4.93

WS vs. COST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WS Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is higher than the COST Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WS and COST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WSCOSTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.29

-0.18

+1.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.59

+0.01

Drawdowns

WS vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WS drawdown since its inception was -50.98%, roughly equal to the maximum COST drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WS and COST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WSCOSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.98%

-53.39%

+2.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.00%

-15.38%

-26.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.20%

-10.93%

-3.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.89%

-13.36%

-8.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.41%

7.15%

+7.26%

Volatility

WS vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

Worthington Steel Inc (WS) has a higher volatility of 11.25% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 7.71%. This indicates that WS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WSCOSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.25%

7.71%

+3.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.67%

14.53%

+20.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.45%

18.79%

+30.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.12%

22.71%

+29.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.12%

21.95%

+30.17%

Dividends

WS vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

WS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, more than COST's 0.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.55%0.59%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%
WS
Worthington Steel Inc
1.54%1.85%2.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

WS vs. COST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Worthington Steel Inc and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00BOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
769.80M
70.53B
(WS) Total Revenue
(COST) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

WS vs. COST - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Worthington Steel Inc and Costco Wholesale Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-30.0%-20.0%-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%October2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
9.9%
-25.1%
Portfolio components
WS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Worthington Steel Inc reported a gross profit of 76.10M and revenue of 769.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.9%.

COST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a gross profit of -17.68B and revenue of 70.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -25.1%.

WS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Worthington Steel Inc reported an operating income of -1.40M and revenue of 769.80M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.2%.

COST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported an operating income of 2.82B and revenue of 70.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.0%.

WS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Worthington Steel Inc reported a net income of 10.40M and revenue of 769.80M, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.

COST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a net income of 2.19B and revenue of 70.53B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


WS and COST have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WS has higher volatility (11.25%) compared to COST (7.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WS dropped -50.98% vs COST's -53.39%.

WS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WS and COST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer