WQDV.L vs. GOGB.L
WQDV.L (iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and GOGB.L (VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - WQDV.L tracks the MSCI World High Dividend Yield ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select Index while GOGB.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WQDV.L returned 11.34%/yr vs 6.07%/yr for GOGB.L. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WQDV.L charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for GOGB.L.
Performance
WQDV.L vs. GOGB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
WQDV.L is traded in USD, while GOGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GOGB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WQDV.L achieves a 12.44% return, which is significantly higher than GOGB.L's -2.17% return.
WQDV.L
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 2.82%
- YTD
- 12.44%
- 6M
- 14.22%
- 1Y
- 28.23%
- 3Y*
- 18.65%
- 5Y*
- 11.34%
- 10Y*
- —
GOGB.L
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -3.01%
- YTD
- -2.17%
- 6M
- -1.04%
- 1Y
- 7.30%
- 3Y*
- 12.29%
- 5Y*
- 6.07%
- 10Y*
- —
WQDV.L vs. GOGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WQDV.L iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 12.44% | 24.16% | 9.75% | 17.23% | -6.95% | 16.00% | 14.68% |
GOGB.L VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat UCITS ETF | -2.17% | 25.78% | 9.37% | 10.34% | -11.10% | 14.86% | 17.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between WQDV.L and GOGB.L is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2020 | 0.79 |
The correlation between WQDV.L and GOGB.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
WQDV.L vs. GOGB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WQDV.L
GOGB.L
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
WQDV.L
GOGB.L
Financial Services
WQDV.L
GOGB.L
Healthcare
WQDV.L
GOGB.L
Industrials
WQDV.L
GOGB.L
Communication Services
WQDV.L
GOGB.L
Consumer Cyclical
WQDV.L
GOGB.L
Energy
WQDV.L
GOGB.L
-
Consumer Defensive
WQDV.L
GOGB.L
Utilities
WQDV.L
GOGB.L
-
Real Estate
WQDV.L
GOGB.L
-
Basic Materials
WQDV.L
GOGB.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WQDV.L vs. GOGB.L — Risk / Return Rank
WQDV.L
GOGB.L
WQDV.L vs. GOGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDV.L) and VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat UCITS ETF (GOGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WQDV.L | GOGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.11 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.61 | 0.59 | +3.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.33 | 1.95 | +11.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WQDV.L | GOGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37 | 0.56 | +1.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.40 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.68 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
WQDV.L vs. GOGB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WQDV.L drawdown since its inception was -33.16%, which is greater than GOGB.L's maximum drawdown of -24.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WQDV.L and GOGB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WQDV.L | GOGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.16% | -24.76% | -8.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.79% | -12.42% | +4.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.03% | -14.50% | +0.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.24% | -24.76% | +3.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.48% | -7.25% | +5.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.28% | -5.30% | +1.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.11% | 3.74% | -1.63% |
Volatility
WQDV.L vs. GOGB.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDV.L) and VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat UCITS ETF (GOGB.L) have volatilities of 3.51% and 3.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WQDV.L | GOGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.51% | 3.35% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.15% | 10.61% | -1.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.89% | 13.04% | -1.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.90% | 15.21% | -1.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.67% | 15.16% | -0.49% |
WQDV.L vs. GOGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
WQDV.L has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than GOGB.L's 0.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
WQDV.L vs. GOGB.L - Dividend Comparison
WQDV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, while GOGB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOGB.L VanEck Morningstar Global Wide Moat UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WQDV.L iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.83% | 2.31% | 2.58% | 2.78% | 2.95% | 2.75% | 2.81% | 3.01% | 3.28% | 0.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WQDV.L and GOGB.L have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WQDV.L is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WQDV.L is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for GOGB.L.
WQDV.L tracks MSCI World High Dividend Yield ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select Index, while GOGB.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for WQDV.L and 0.52% for GOGB.L.
Find the right allocation for WQDV.L and GOGB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer