PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WPP vs. NG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WPP vs. NG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WPP plc (WPP) and National Grid plc (NG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WPP is traded in USD, while NG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the NG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WPP achieves a -20.08% return, which is significantly lower than NG.L's 7.13% return. Over the past 10 years, WPP has underperformed NG.L with an annualized return of -12.62%, while NG.L has yielded a comparatively higher 7.12% annualized return.


WPP

1D
-1.36%
1M
-5.37%
YTD
-20.08%
6M
-9.61%
1Y
-51.45%
3Y*
-27.77%
5Y*
-20.45%
10Y*
-12.62%

NG.L

1D
-1.18%
1M
-5.50%
YTD
7.13%
6M
8.78%
1Y
18.94%
3Y*
15.14%
5Y*
11.27%
10Y*
7.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WPP vs. NG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WPP
WPP plc
-20.08%-53.53%13.55%1.49%-31.96%43.52%-17.24%36.53%-36.30%-14.98%
NG.L
National Grid plc
7.13%34.97%2.07%17.81%-12.98%26.12%-1.26%35.93%-14.22%5.52%

Correlation

The correlation between WPP and NG.L is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2007

0.31

Over the past year, the correlation between WPP and NG.L has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WPP:

$3.75B

NG.L:

£59.84B

EPS

WPP:

$1.51

NG.L:

£1.24

PE Ratio

WPP:

11.58

NG.L:

9.72

PEG Ratio

WPP:

0.15

NG.L:

0.23

PS Ratio

WPP:

0.13

NG.L:

1.65

PB Ratio

WPP:

1.48

NG.L:

1.52

Total Revenue (TTM)

WPP:

$28.29B

NG.L:

£36.07B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WPP:

$4.60B

NG.L:

£29.59B

EBITDA (TTM)

WPP:

$2.22B

NG.L:

£14.89B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WPP vs. NG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WPP
WPP Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
WPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
WPP Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
WPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
WPP Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

NG.L
NG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
NG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
NG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
NG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
NG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WPP vs. NG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WPP plc (WPP) and National Grid plc (NG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WPPNG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.79

1.18

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.87

1.19

-2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.22

3.68

-4.90

WPP vs. NG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WPP Sharpe Ratio is -1.07, which is lower than the NG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WPP and NG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WPPNG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.07

0.89

-1.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.59

0.52

-1.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.36

0.32

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

0.31

-0.30

Drawdowns

WPP vs. NG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WPP drawdown since its inception was -95.30%, which is greater than NG.L's maximum drawdown of -55.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WPP and NG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WPPNG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.30%

-55.48%

-39.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-59.39%

-15.92%

-43.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-71.59%

-19.97%

-51.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.69%

-39.09%

-38.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.99%

-39.09%

-40.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-76.22%

-12.56%

-63.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.50%

-12.81%

-29.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

42.31%

5.13%

+37.18%

Volatility

WPP vs. NG.L - Volatility Comparison

WPP plc (WPP) has a higher volatility of 13.71% compared to National Grid plc (NG.L) at 11.21%. This indicates that WPP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WPPNG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.71%

11.21%

+2.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.91%

18.00%

+14.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.22%

21.23%

+26.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.80%

21.75%

+13.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.12%

22.44%

+12.68%

Dividends

WPP vs. NG.L - Dividend Comparison

WPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.79%, more than NG.L's 4.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NG.L
National Grid plc
4.03%4.14%5.79%5.39%3.85%3.47%4.89%4.91%4.53%15.43%4.97%5.01%
WPP
WPP plc
5.79%9.09%4.85%5.09%4.38%2.45%5.66%5.47%7.35%4.32%3.01%2.81%

Financials

WPP vs. NG.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between WPP plc and National Grid plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


6.00B7.00B8.00B9.00B10.00B11.00B12.00B202120222023202420252026
6.89B
10.62B
(WPP) Total Revenue
(NG.L) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. WPP values in USD, NG.L values in GBp

WPP vs. NG.L - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between WPP plc and National Grid plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202120222023202420252026
19.0%
39.0%
Portfolio components
WPP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WPP plc reported a gross profit of 1.31B and revenue of 6.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.0%.

NG.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National Grid plc reported a gross profit of 4.15B and revenue of 10.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.0%.

WPP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WPP plc reported an operating income of 161.00M and revenue of 6.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.3%.

NG.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National Grid plc reported an operating income of 4.15B and revenue of 10.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 39.0%.

WPP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WPP plc reported a net income of -259.00M and revenue of 6.89B, resulting in a net margin of -3.8%.

NG.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, National Grid plc reported a net income of 2.62B and revenue of 10.62B, resulting in a net margin of 24.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


WPP and NG.L have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WPP and NG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer