PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WPP vs. BT-A.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WPP vs. BT-A.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WPP plc (WPP) and BT Group plc (BT-A.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WPP is traded in USD, while BT-A.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the BT-A.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WPP achieves a -20.08% return, which is significantly lower than BT-A.L's 10.13% return. Over the past 10 years, WPP has underperformed BT-A.L with an annualized return of -12.62%, while BT-A.L has yielded a comparatively higher -3.17% annualized return.


WPP

1D
-1.36%
1M
-5.37%
YTD
-20.08%
6M
-9.61%
1Y
-51.45%
3Y*
-27.77%
5Y*
-20.45%
10Y*
-12.62%

BT-A.L

1D
1.54%
1M
-15.27%
YTD
10.13%
6M
17.23%
1Y
18.02%
3Y*
20.28%
5Y*
5.90%
10Y*
-3.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WPP vs. BT-A.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WPP
WPP plc
-20.08%-53.53%13.55%1.49%-31.96%43.52%-17.24%36.53%-36.30%-14.98%
BT-A.L
BT Group plc
10.13%43.14%21.63%23.91%-37.69%28.79%-29.17%-8.63%-11.85%-14.56%

Correlation

The correlation between WPP and BT-A.L is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2007

0.39

Over the past year, the correlation between WPP and BT-A.L has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM)

WPP:

$28.29B

BT-A.L:

£20.36B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WPP:

$4.60B

BT-A.L:

£9.54B

EBITDA (TTM)

WPP:

$2.22B

BT-A.L:

£7.36B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WPP vs. BT-A.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WPP
WPP Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
WPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
WPP Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
WPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
WPP Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

BT-A.L
BT-A.L Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
BT-A.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BT-A.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
BT-A.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
BT-A.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
BT-A.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WPP vs. BT-A.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WPP plc (WPP) and BT Group plc (BT-A.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WPPBT-A.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.79

1.14

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.87

0.80

-1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.22

1.65

-2.87

WPP vs. BT-A.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WPP Sharpe Ratio is -1.07, which is lower than the BT-A.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WPP and BT-A.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WPPBT-A.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.07

0.65

-1.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.59

0.19

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.36

-0.10

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

-0.01

+0.02

Drawdowns

WPP vs. BT-A.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WPP drawdown since its inception was -95.30%, which is greater than BT-A.L's maximum drawdown of -83.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WPP and BT-A.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WPPBT-A.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.30%

-83.54%

-11.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-59.39%

-22.31%

-37.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-71.59%

-26.54%

-45.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.69%

-52.51%

-25.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.99%

-75.92%

-4.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-76.22%

-41.39%

-34.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.50%

-45.87%

+3.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

42.31%

10.87%

+31.44%

Volatility

WPP vs. BT-A.L - Volatility Comparison

WPP plc (WPP) has a higher volatility of 13.71% compared to BT Group plc (BT-A.L) at 12.02%. This indicates that WPP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BT-A.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WPPBT-A.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.71%

12.02%

+1.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.91%

21.42%

+11.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.22%

27.65%

+20.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.80%

31.59%

+3.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.12%

33.13%

+1.99%

Dividends

WPP vs. BT-A.L - Dividend Comparison

WPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.79%, more than BT-A.L's 4.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BT-A.L
BT Group plc
4.01%4.46%5.62%6.23%6.87%1.36%0.00%8.00%6.37%5.67%3.94%2.73%
WPP
WPP plc
5.79%9.09%4.85%5.09%4.38%2.45%5.66%5.47%7.35%4.32%3.01%2.81%

Financials

WPP vs. BT-A.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between WPP plc and BT Group plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B5.50B6.00B6.50B7.00B7.50B20212022202320242025
6.89B
5.12B
(WPP) Total Revenue
(BT-A.L) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. WPP values in USD, BT-A.L values in GBp

Frequently Asked Questions


WPP and BT-A.L have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WPP and BT-A.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer