WPM.TO vs. CLS.TO
WPM.TO (Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.) and CLS.TO (Celestica Inc.) are both stocks. WPM.TO operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while CLS.TO operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past 10 years, WPM.TO returned 20.97%/yr vs 44.44%/yr for CLS.TO. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WPM.TO vs. CLS.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WPM.TO achieves a -0.44% return, which is significantly lower than CLS.TO's 32.58% return. Over the past 10 years, WPM.TO has underperformed CLS.TO with an annualized return of 20.97%, while CLS.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 44.44% annualized return.
WPM.TO
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- -15.56%
- YTD
- -0.44%
- 6M
- 10.42%
- 1Y
- 32.64%
- 3Y*
- 40.12%
- 5Y*
- 24.15%
- 10Y*
- 20.97%
CLS.TO
- 1D
- 3.80%
- 1M
- 4.71%
- YTD
- 32.58%
- 6M
- 13.91%
- 1Y
- 225.20%
- 3Y*
- 213.80%
- 5Y*
- 120.83%
- 10Y*
- 44.44%
WPM.TO vs. CLS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WPM.TO Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. | -0.44% | 100.91% | 25.13% | 25.20% | -1.07% | 3.20% | 39.06% | 47.18% | -2.24% | 8.88% |
CLS.TO Celestica Inc. | 32.58% | 206.05% | 241.82% | 154.33% | 8.23% | 37.29% | -4.64% | -9.95% | -9.26% | -17.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between WPM.TO and CLS.TO is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2006 | 0.12 |
The correlation between WPM.TO and CLS.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (10 years) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
WPM.TO:
CA$72.86B
CLS.TO:
CA$62.28B
WPM.TO:
CA$3.96
CLS.TO:
CA$8.28
WPM.TO:
40.49
CLS.TO:
64.97
WPM.TO:
1.09
CLS.TO:
0.87
WPM.TO:
26.54
CLS.TO:
4.52
WPM.TO:
7.88
CLS.TO:
29.68
WPM.TO:
CA$2.74B
CLS.TO:
CA$13.81B
WPM.TO:
CA$2.12B
CLS.TO:
CA$1.60B
WPM.TO:
CA$2.37B
CLS.TO:
CA$1.36B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WPM.TO vs. CLS.TO — Risk / Return Rank
WPM.TO
CLS.TO
WPM.TO vs. CLS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM.TO) and Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WPM.TO | CLS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.41 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.07 | 7.15 | -6.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.91 | 17.88 | -14.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WPM.TO | CLS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 | 3.17 | -2.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 2.16 | -1.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.92 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.47 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
WPM.TO vs. CLS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WPM.TO drawdown since its inception was -83.21%, roughly equal to the maximum CLS.TO drawdown of -79.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WPM.TO and CLS.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WPM.TO | CLS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.21% | -79.32% | -3.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.69% | -31.71% | +1.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.69% | -54.25% | +23.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.04% | -54.25% | +15.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.50% | -79.32% | +31.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.12% | -17.55% | -11.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.70% | -28.86% | +3.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.25% | 12.66% | -1.41% |
Volatility
WPM.TO vs. CLS.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM.TO) is 17.73%, while Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO) has a volatility of 26.92%. This indicates that WPM.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WPM.TO | CLS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.73% | 26.92% | -9.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.89% | 54.95% | -17.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.43% | 71.57% | -27.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.33% | 56.52% | -23.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.20% | 48.79% | -13.59% |
Dividends
WPM.TO vs. CLS.TO - Dividend Comparison
WPM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, while CLS.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLS.TO Celestica Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WPM.TO Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. | 0.63% | 0.57% | 1.05% | 1.25% | 1.40% | 1.05% | 1.08% | 1.24% | 1.75% | 1.54% | 1.06% | 1.48% |
Financials
WPM.TO vs. CLS.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WPM.TO vs. CLS.TO - Profitability Comparison
WPM.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. reported a gross profit of 687.49M and revenue of 886.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.5%.
CLS.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 437.20M and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.
WPM.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. reported an operating income of 665.21M and revenue of 886.69M, resulting in an operating margin of 75.0%.
CLS.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 267.70M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.6%.
WPM.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. reported a net income of 572.50M and revenue of 886.69M, resulting in a net margin of 64.6%.
CLS.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 212.30M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WPM.TO and CLS.TO have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for WPM.TO and CLS.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer