PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WOSC.L vs. VT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WOSC.L vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WOSC.L) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WOSC.L is traded in GBP, while VT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VT values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WOSC.L achieves a 13.05% return, which is significantly higher than VT's 10.84% return. Over the past 10 years, WOSC.L has underperformed VT with an annualized return of 10.76%, while VT has yielded a comparatively higher 13.36% annualized return.


WOSC.L

1D
0.20%
1M
2.05%
YTD
13.05%
6M
13.27%
1Y
31.20%
3Y*
14.19%
5Y*
7.45%
10Y*
10.76%

VT

1D
0.49%
1M
1.70%
YTD
10.84%
6M
10.41%
1Y
27.19%
3Y*
17.48%
5Y*
11.79%
10Y*
13.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WOSC.L vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WOSC.L
SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF
13.05%11.77%9.41%9.96%-8.76%16.26%12.23%22.09%-9.61%10.93%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
10.84%13.71%18.53%15.92%-8.25%19.39%13.16%21.99%-4.41%13.73%

Correlation

The correlation between WOSC.L and VT is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2013

0.59

The correlation between WOSC.L and VT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

WOSC.L vs. VT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WOSC.L
VT

Industrials

20.5%
12.0%

Financial Services

13.6%
15.9%

Technology

13.4%
27.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%
9.5%

Healthcare

9.5%
8.1%

Basic Materials

8.2%
4.2%

Real Estate

8.2%
2.4%

Energy

5.6%
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
4.8%

Communication Services

3.0%
8.3%

Utilities

2.8%
2.7%

Industrials

WOSC.L
20.5%
VT
12.0%

Financial Services

WOSC.L
13.6%
VT
15.9%

Technology

WOSC.L
13.4%
VT
27.8%

Consumer Cyclical

WOSC.L
10.9%
VT
9.5%

Healthcare

WOSC.L
9.5%
VT
8.1%

Basic Materials

WOSC.L
8.2%
VT
4.2%

Real Estate

WOSC.L
8.2%
VT
2.4%

Energy

WOSC.L
5.6%
VT
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

WOSC.L
4.2%
VT
4.8%

Communication Services

WOSC.L
3.0%
VT
8.3%

Utilities

WOSC.L
2.8%
VT
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WOSC.L vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WOSC.L
WOSC.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
WOSC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WOSC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
WOSC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
WOSC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
WOSC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

VT
VT Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WOSC.L vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WOSC.L) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WOSC.LVTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.45

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.97

3.62

+0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.20

14.89

+0.31

WOSC.L vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WOSC.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the VT Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WOSC.L and VT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WOSC.LVTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

2.36

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.84

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.81

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.60

-0.33

Drawdowns

WOSC.L vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WOSC.L drawdown since its inception was -40.46%, which is greater than VT's maximum drawdown of -31.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WOSC.L and VT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WOSC.LVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.46%

-31.81%

-8.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.83%

-7.55%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.44%

-17.91%

-3.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.44%

-17.91%

-3.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.13%

-26.93%

-9.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

-2.16%

+1.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.99%

-4.54%

-7.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

1.83%

+0.22%

Volatility

WOSC.L vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (WOSC.L) is 3.44%, while Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a volatility of 3.78%. This indicates that WOSC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WOSC.LVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.44%

3.78%

-0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.36%

9.00%

+0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.81%

11.59%

+1.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.29%

14.16%

+6.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.77%

16.56%

+6.21%

WOSC.L vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

WOSC.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

WOSC.L vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

WOSC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.63%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%
WOSC.L
SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WOSC.L and VT have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WOSC.L.

WOSC.L tracks MSCI ACWI SMID NR USD, while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WOSC.L and 0.06% for VT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WOSC.L and VT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer