PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WOR vs. NEOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WOR vs. NEOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Worthington Industries, Inc. (WOR) and NeoVolta Inc. Common Stock (NEOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WOR achieves a 12.61% return, which is significantly higher than NEOV's -35.20% return.


WOR

1D
0.92%
1M
6.25%
YTD
12.61%
6M
5.59%
1Y
-2.70%
3Y*
17.19%
5Y*
9.15%
10Y*
11.15%

NEOV

1D
0.51%
1M
-25.38%
YTD
-35.20%
6M
-43.39%
1Y
-35.62%
3Y*
-13.27%
5Y*
-22.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WOR vs. NEOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
WOR
Worthington Industries, Inc.
12.61%30.29%-29.34%91.65%-6.90%8.43%90.95%
NEOV
NeoVolta Inc. Common Stock
-35.20%-41.65%225.62%-42.65%-60.20%60.78%237.98%

Correlation

The correlation between WOR and NEOV is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2020

0.09

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WOR:

$2.84B

NEOV:

$79.17M

EPS

WOR:

$2.27

NEOV:

-$0.32

PS Ratio

WOR:

2.14

NEOV:

4.40

PB Ratio

WOR:

2.84

NEOV:

3.57

Total Revenue (TTM)

WOR:

$1.33B

NEOV:

$16.05M

Gross Profit (TTM)

WOR:

$369.08M

NEOV:

$3.74M

EBITDA (TTM)

WOR:

$159.44M

NEOV:

-$9.07M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WOR vs. NEOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WOR
WOR Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
WOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
WOR Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
WOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
WOR Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

NEOV
NEOV Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
NEOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEOV Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
NEOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEOV Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WOR vs. NEOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Worthington Industries, Inc. (WOR) and NeoVolta Inc. Common Stock (NEOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WORNEOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.05

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.09

-0.49

+0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.17

-1.00

+0.83

WOR vs. NEOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WOR Sharpe Ratio is -0.09, which is higher than the NEOV Sharpe Ratio of -0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WOR and NEOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WORNEOVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

-0.29

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

-0.24

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.08

+0.15

Drawdowns

WOR vs. NEOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WOR drawdown since its inception was -70.94%, smaller than the maximum NEOV drawdown of -90.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WOR and NEOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WORNEOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.94%

-90.38%

+19.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.83%

-73.60%

+43.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.42%

-84.32%

+41.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.42%

-90.38%

+47.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.28%

-72.52%

+59.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.23%

-38.92%

+18.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.02%

35.68%

-19.66%

Volatility

WOR vs. NEOV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Worthington Industries, Inc. (WOR) is 6.93%, while NeoVolta Inc. Common Stock (NEOV) has a volatility of 71.79%. This indicates that WOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WORNEOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.93%

71.79%

-64.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.48%

102.83%

-82.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.95%

121.65%

-92.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.24%

93.71%

-55.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.98%

86.56%

-46.58%

Dividends

WOR vs. NEOV - Dividend Comparison

WOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, while NEOV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NEOV
NeoVolta Inc. Common Stock
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WOR
Worthington Industries, Inc.
1.28%1.40%1.65%49.97%2.37%1.99%1.91%2.23%2.53%1.86%1.64%2.46%

Financials

WOR vs. NEOV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Worthington Industries, Inc. and NeoVolta Inc. Common Stock. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
378.68M
0
(WOR) Total Revenue
(NEOV) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


WOR and NEOV have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEOV has higher volatility (71.79%) compared to WOR (6.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WOR dropped -70.94% vs NEOV's -90.38%.

WOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.09 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WOR and NEOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer