WMVG.L vs. XDEQ.L
WMVG.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc)) and XDEQ.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C) are both Global Equities funds - WMVG.L tracks the MSCI World Minimum Volatility while XDEQ.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WMVG.L returned 6.05%/yr vs 11.29%/yr for XDEQ.L. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WMVG.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDEQ.L.
Performance
WMVG.L vs. XDEQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
WMVG.L is traded in GBP, while XDEQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XDEQ.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WMVG.L achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly lower than XDEQ.L's 8.07% return.
WMVG.L
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 1.52%
- YTD
- 1.26%
- 6M
- 2.42%
- 1Y
- 2.81%
- 3Y*
- 9.88%
- 5Y*
- 6.05%
- 10Y*
- —
XDEQ.L
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 2.87%
- YTD
- 8.07%
- 6M
- 8.54%
- 1Y
- 20.96%
- 3Y*
- 15.64%
- 5Y*
- 11.29%
- 10Y*
- 13.42%
WMVG.L vs. XDEQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WMVG.L iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) | 1.26% | 9.07% | 14.47% | 7.36% | -8.31% | 16.96% | -1.30% | 11.93% |
XDEQ.L Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C | 8.07% | 7.52% | 18.91% | 19.22% | -9.44% | 25.15% | 10.98% | 17.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between WMVG.L and XDEQ.L is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2019 | 0.63 |
Over the past year, the correlation between WMVG.L and XDEQ.L has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
WMVG.L vs. XDEQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WMVG.L
XDEQ.L
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
WMVG.L
XDEQ.L
Financial Services
WMVG.L
XDEQ.L
Healthcare
WMVG.L
XDEQ.L
Communication Services
WMVG.L
XDEQ.L
Consumer Defensive
WMVG.L
XDEQ.L
Industrials
WMVG.L
XDEQ.L
Utilities
WMVG.L
XDEQ.L
Consumer Cyclical
WMVG.L
XDEQ.L
Energy
WMVG.L
XDEQ.L
Basic Materials
WMVG.L
XDEQ.L
Real Estate
WMVG.L
XDEQ.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WMVG.L vs. XDEQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
WMVG.L
XDEQ.L
WMVG.L vs. XDEQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (WMVG.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WMVG.L | XDEQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.40 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.57 | 3.02 | -2.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.39 | 12.54 | -11.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WMVG.L | XDEQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 | 2.13 | -1.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.59 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.27 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
WMVG.L vs. XDEQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WMVG.L drawdown since its inception was -28.25%, smaller than the maximum XDEQ.L drawdown of -44.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMVG.L and XDEQ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WMVG.L | XDEQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.25% | -44.31% | +16.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.93% | -6.90% | +1.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.07% | -20.24% | +11.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.18% | -20.24% | +5.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.25% | -0.52% | -2.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.11% | -12.46% | +8.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.02% | 1.67% | +0.35% |
Volatility
WMVG.L vs. XDEQ.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (WMVG.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.L) have volatilities of 2.22% and 2.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WMVG.L | XDEQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.22% | 2.33% | -0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.01% | 7.11% | -2.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.31% | 9.83% | -2.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.99% | 19.16% | -9.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.15% | 20.54% | -8.39% |
WMVG.L vs. XDEQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
WMVG.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XDEQ.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
WMVG.L vs. XDEQ.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither WMVG.L nor XDEQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
WMVG.L and XDEQ.L have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDEQ.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDEQ.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for WMVG.L.
WMVG.L tracks MSCI World Minimum Volatility, while XDEQ.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for WMVG.L and 0.25% for XDEQ.L.
Find the right allocation for WMVG.L and XDEQ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer