WMVG.L vs. IEFQ.L
WMVG.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc)) and IEFQ.L (iShares Edge MSCIope Quality Factor UCITS) are both exchange-traded funds - WMVG.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Minimum Volatility, while IEFQ.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WMVG.L returned 6.05%/yr vs 5.85%/yr for IEFQ.L. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WMVG.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IEFQ.L.
Performance
WMVG.L vs. IEFQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
WMVG.L is traded in GBP, while IEFQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IEFQ.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WMVG.L achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly lower than IEFQ.L's 3.84% return.
WMVG.L
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 1.52%
- YTD
- 1.26%
- 6M
- 2.42%
- 1Y
- 2.81%
- 3Y*
- 9.88%
- 5Y*
- 6.05%
- 10Y*
- —
IEFQ.L
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 1.51%
- YTD
- 3.84%
- 6M
- 5.42%
- 1Y
- 9.37%
- 3Y*
- 8.39%
- 5Y*
- 5.85%
- 10Y*
- 9.13%
WMVG.L vs. IEFQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WMVG.L iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) | 1.26% | 9.07% | 14.47% | 7.36% | -8.31% | 16.96% | -1.30% | 11.93% |
IEFQ.L iShares Edge MSCIope Quality Factor UCITS | 3.84% | 14.94% | -0.69% | 12.31% | -6.34% | 18.16% | 6.81% | 18.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between WMVG.L and IEFQ.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2019 | 0.64 |
The correlation between WMVG.L and IEFQ.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
WMVG.L vs. IEFQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WMVG.L
IEFQ.L
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
WMVG.L
IEFQ.L
Financial Services
WMVG.L
IEFQ.L
Healthcare
WMVG.L
IEFQ.L
Communication Services
WMVG.L
IEFQ.L
Consumer Defensive
WMVG.L
IEFQ.L
Industrials
WMVG.L
IEFQ.L
Utilities
WMVG.L
IEFQ.L
Consumer Cyclical
WMVG.L
IEFQ.L
Energy
WMVG.L
IEFQ.L
Basic Materials
WMVG.L
IEFQ.L
Real Estate
WMVG.L
IEFQ.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WMVG.L vs. IEFQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
WMVG.L
IEFQ.L
WMVG.L vs. IEFQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (WMVG.L) and iShares Edge MSCIope Quality Factor UCITS (IEFQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WMVG.L | IEFQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.15 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.57 | 0.96 | -0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.39 | 3.08 | -1.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WMVG.L | IEFQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 | 0.82 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.37 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.56 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
WMVG.L vs. IEFQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WMVG.L drawdown since its inception was -28.25%, which is greater than IEFQ.L's maximum drawdown of -26.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMVG.L and IEFQ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WMVG.L | IEFQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.25% | -26.38% | -1.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.93% | -9.67% | +4.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.07% | -11.99% | +2.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.18% | -17.73% | +2.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.25% | -3.16% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.11% | -4.23% | +0.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.02% | 3.03% | -1.01% |
Volatility
WMVG.L vs. IEFQ.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (WMVG.L) is 2.22%, while iShares Edge MSCIope Quality Factor UCITS (IEFQ.L) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that WMVG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEFQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WMVG.L | IEFQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.22% | 2.84% | -0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.01% | 9.39% | -4.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.31% | 11.46% | -4.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.99% | 15.70% | -5.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.15% | 15.31% | -3.16% |
WMVG.L vs. IEFQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
WMVG.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IEFQ.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
WMVG.L vs. IEFQ.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither WMVG.L nor IEFQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
WMVG.L and IEFQ.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IEFQ.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IEFQ.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for WMVG.L.
WMVG.L is categorized as Global Equities, while IEFQ.L is Europe Equities. WMVG.L tracks MSCI World Minimum Volatility, while IEFQ.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for WMVG.L and 0.25% for IEFQ.L.
Find the right allocation for WMVG.L and IEFQ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer