PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WMVG.L vs. IEFQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WMVG.L vs. IEFQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (WMVG.L) and iShares Edge MSCIope Quality Factor UCITS (IEFQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WMVG.L is traded in GBP, while IEFQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IEFQ.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WMVG.L achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly lower than IEFQ.L's 3.84% return.


WMVG.L

1D
-0.37%
1M
1.52%
YTD
1.26%
6M
2.42%
1Y
2.81%
3Y*
9.88%
5Y*
6.05%
10Y*

IEFQ.L

1D
0.27%
1M
1.51%
YTD
3.84%
6M
5.42%
1Y
9.37%
3Y*
8.39%
5Y*
5.85%
10Y*
9.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WMVG.L vs. IEFQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
WMVG.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc)
1.26%9.07%14.47%7.36%-8.31%16.96%-1.30%11.93%
IEFQ.L
iShares Edge MSCIope Quality Factor UCITS
3.84%14.94%-0.69%12.31%-6.34%18.16%6.81%18.09%

Correlation

The correlation between WMVG.L and IEFQ.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2019

0.64

The correlation between WMVG.L and IEFQ.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WMVG.L vs. IEFQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WMVG.L
IEFQ.L

Technology

20.1%
10.8%

Financial Services

14.0%
21.1%

Healthcare

13.8%
14.2%

Communication Services

12.1%
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

10.9%
8.1%

Industrials

9.2%
19.5%

Utilities

8.0%
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

5.6%
6.6%

Energy

4.5%
5.2%

Basic Materials

1.1%
5.6%

Real Estate

0.7%
0.8%

Technology

WMVG.L
20.1%
IEFQ.L
10.8%

Financial Services

WMVG.L
14.0%
IEFQ.L
21.1%

Healthcare

WMVG.L
13.8%
IEFQ.L
14.2%

Communication Services

WMVG.L
12.1%
IEFQ.L
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

WMVG.L
10.9%
IEFQ.L
8.1%

Industrials

WMVG.L
9.2%
IEFQ.L
19.5%

Utilities

WMVG.L
8.0%
IEFQ.L
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

WMVG.L
5.6%
IEFQ.L
6.6%

Energy

WMVG.L
4.5%
IEFQ.L
5.2%

Basic Materials

WMVG.L
1.1%
IEFQ.L
5.6%

Real Estate

WMVG.L
0.7%
IEFQ.L
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WMVG.L vs. IEFQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WMVG.L
WMVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
WMVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
WMVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

IEFQ.L
IEFQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
IEFQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEFQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEFQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
IEFQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEFQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WMVG.L vs. IEFQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (WMVG.L) and iShares Edge MSCIope Quality Factor UCITS (IEFQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WMVG.LIEFQ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.15

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.57

0.96

-0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.39

3.08

-1.70

WMVG.L vs. IEFQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WMVG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the IEFQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WMVG.L and IEFQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WMVG.LIEFQ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

0.82

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.37

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.56

-0.01

Drawdowns

WMVG.L vs. IEFQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WMVG.L drawdown since its inception was -28.25%, which is greater than IEFQ.L's maximum drawdown of -26.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMVG.L and IEFQ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WMVG.LIEFQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.25%

-26.38%

-1.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.93%

-9.67%

+4.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.07%

-11.99%

+2.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.18%

-17.73%

+2.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.25%

-3.16%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.11%

-4.23%

+0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

3.03%

-1.01%

Volatility

WMVG.L vs. IEFQ.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (WMVG.L) is 2.22%, while iShares Edge MSCIope Quality Factor UCITS (IEFQ.L) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that WMVG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEFQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WMVG.LIEFQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.22%

2.84%

-0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.01%

9.39%

-4.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.31%

11.46%

-4.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.99%

15.70%

-5.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.15%

15.31%

-3.16%

WMVG.L vs. IEFQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WMVG.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IEFQ.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

WMVG.L vs. IEFQ.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither WMVG.L nor IEFQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


WMVG.L and IEFQ.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IEFQ.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IEFQ.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for WMVG.L.

WMVG.L is categorized as Global Equities, while IEFQ.L is Europe Equities. WMVG.L tracks MSCI World Minimum Volatility, while IEFQ.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for WMVG.L and 0.25% for IEFQ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WMVG.L and IEFQ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer